Correct Option
The correct option is (a) 1 only.
Explanation
The periodisation of Indian history has been a subject of debate among historians. In the early nineteenth century, British historians attempted to classify Indian history to better understand and govern the colony. The most prominent of these classifications was proposed by James Mill.
Statement-wise Analysis
- Statement 1 is Correct: In 1817, James Mill, a Scottish economist and political philosopher, published a massive three-volume work, A History of British India. In this work, he divided Indian history into three distinct periods: Hindu, Muslim, and British. This periodisation came to be widely accepted at the time.
- Statement 2 is Incorrect: Mill’s division was based primarily on the religion of the rulers reigning at the time. He argued that the religion of the rulers was the only significant historical change worth noting. This classification ignored the rich diversity and significant developments in society, economy, and culture that occurred independently of the ruler's faith. It also failed to acknowledge that rulers in ancient India did not all share the same faith, nor was the medieval period exclusively "Muslim" in its social fabric.
Key Takeaway
James Mill's periodisation (Hindu, Muslim, British) was based on the religion of the rulers, ignoring social, economic, and cultural complexities. Modern historians reject this communal periodisation, preferring terms like Ancient, Medieval, and Modern.