The correct option is (c).
Explanation
In the medieval period, before the advent of the printing press, manuscripts were replicated by hand. This process was undertaken by scribes. The nature of handwritten copying, combined with the evolution of distinct Persian and Arabic calligraphic styles, significantly influenced the preservation of historical texts and the challenges faced by modern historians.
Statement-wise Analysis
- Statement 1 is Incorrect. Scribes did not copy manuscripts with absolute precision. As they copied, they often introduced small changes-a word here, a sentence there-either inadvertently or deliberately to "improve" the text. Over centuries of copying and recopying, these minor differences accumulated, causing later manuscripts to differ substantially from the original versions.
- Statement 2 is Correct. Different styles of handwriting played a crucial role in the legibility of manuscripts. The Nastaliq style is cursive, fluid, and generally easier to read. In contrast, the Shikaste style is denser, more compact, and significantly more difficult to decipher.
- Statement 3 is Correct. Due to the accumulation of scribal errors described in Statement 1, the original manuscript of an author is rarely available today. Historians are dependent on copies made by later scribes. Consequently, they must read and cross-reference multiple manuscript versions of the same text to reconstruct what the author originally wrote.
Key Takeaway
Manuscript Transmission: The absence of printing technology led to
scribal errors and textual variations over time. Persian scripts varied in legibility, with
Nastaliq being clearer and
Shikaste being denser and harder to read.