Consider the following statements regarding the Prashasti of the Pratihara king Nagabhata: 1. It was written in Pali and found in Pataliputra. 2. It describes his victory over the King of Vanga (Bengal). 3. It claims he won a victory over Chakrayudha, the ruler of Kanauj. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

The correct option is (c) 2 and 3 only. Explanation Prashastis are eulogistic inscriptions composed by court poets to praise the achievements, lineage, and military victories of rulers. The Gwalior Prashasti is a significant epigraphic source detailing the achievements of the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, particularly King Nagabhata II. Statement-wise Analysis: - Statement 1 is Incorrect. The Prashasti of Nagabhata was not written in Pali nor found in Pataliputra. It was found in Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) and is written in Sanskrit using the Nagari script. It serves as a primary source for the history of the Gurjara-Pratiharas. - Statement 2 is Correct. The inscription details Nagabhata II's military exploits. It explicitly mentions his success against the King of Vanga (Bengal), who is identified by historians as the Pala ruler Dharmapala. This conflict was part of the Tripartite Struggle for control over northern India. - Statement 3 is Correct. The Prashasti records that Nagabhata II defeated Chakrayudha, the ruler of Kanauj. Chakrayudha was a nominee or vassal of the Pala king Dharmapala. Following this victory, Nagabhata II transferred his capital to Kanauj, marking the height of Pratihara power. Key Takeaway: The Gwalior Prashasti is a Sanskrit inscription that documents the military expansion of the Gurjara-Pratihara king Nagabhata II, specifically his victories over the rulers of Vanga (Palas) and Kanauj (Chakrayudha).

NCERT Class 7 History — Chapter 2: Kings and Kingdoms

mcqhard

Consider the following statements regarding the Prashasti of the Pratihara king Nagabhata:

It was written in Pali and found in Pataliputra.
It describes his victory over the King of Vanga (Bengal).
It claims he won a victory over Chakrayudha, the ruler of Kanauj.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Official previous-year question

Verified 1 Aug 2026.

Options

A1 and 2 only
B2 only
C2 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3

Did you get this right?

Solution

The correct option is (c) 2 and 3 only.

Explanation

Prashastis are eulogistic inscriptions composed by court poets to praise the achievements, lineage, and military victories of rulers. The Gwalior Prashasti is a significant epigraphic source detailing the achievements of the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty, particularly King Nagabhata II.

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Incorrect. The Prashasti of Nagabhata was not written in Pali nor found in Pataliputra. It was found in Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) and is written in Sanskrit using the Nagari script. It serves as a primary source for the history of the Gurjara-Pratiharas.
Statement 2 is Correct. The inscription details Nagabhata II's military exploits. It explicitly mentions his success against the King of Vanga (Bengal), who is identified by historians as the Pala ruler Dharmapala. This conflict was part of the Tripartite Struggle for control over northern India.
Statement 3 is Correct. The Prashasti records that Nagabhata II defeated Chakrayudha, the ruler of Kanauj. Chakrayudha was a nominee or vassal of the Pala king Dharmapala. Following this victory, Nagabhata II transferred his capital to Kanauj, marking the height of Pratihara power.

Key Takeaway:

The Gwalior Prashasti is a Sanskrit inscription that documents the military expansion of the Gurjara-Pratihara king Nagabhata II, specifically his victories over the rulers of Vanga (Palas) and Kanauj (Chakrayudha).

Your note

More from Chapter 2: Kings and Kingdoms

Consider the following statements regarding the ritual of hiranya-garbha: 1. It was performed by the Rashtrakuta chief Dantidurga to overthrow his Chalukya overlord. 2. The ritual literally translates to "the iron womb". 3. It was believed that this ritual allowed the sacrificer to be reborn as a Kshatriya, even if he was not one by birth. Which of the statements given above are correct?

easy

With reference to the emergence of new dynasties in the early medieval period, which of the following pairs of rulers and their original professions is/are correctly matched? 1. Kadamba Mayurasharman : Brahmana 2. Gurjara-Pratihara Harichandra : Kshatriya 3. Dantidurga : Rashtrakuta Chief Select the correct answer using the code given below:

medium

In the context of early medieval India, which of the following titles was adopted by kings to demonstrate high status?

easy

The term vetti, frequently mentioned in the inscriptions of the Cholas, refers to:

easy

In the context of the "Tripartite Struggle" for control over Kanauj, which three dynasties were involved?

easy

Keep practising Chapter 2: Kings and Kingdoms

Work through every question from this NCERT chapter.

Browse all NCERT Class 7 History chapters

The correct option is (c) 2 and 3 only.

Explanation

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Incorrect. The Prashasti of Nagabhata was not written in Pali nor found in Pataliputra. It was found in Gwalior (Madhya Pradesh) and is written in Sanskrit using the Nagari script. It serves as a primary source for the history of the Gurjara-Pratiharas.
Statement 2 is Correct. The inscription details Nagabhata II's military exploits. It explicitly mentions his success against the King of Vanga (Bengal), who is identified by historians as the Pala ruler Dharmapala. This conflict was part of the Tripartite Struggle for control over northern India.
Statement 3 is Correct. The Prashasti records that Nagabhata II defeated Chakrayudha, the ruler of Kanauj. Chakrayudha was a nominee or vassal of the Pala king Dharmapala. Following this victory, Nagabhata II transferred his capital to Kanauj, marking the height of Pratihara power.

Key Takeaway: