Correct Option (D):
Neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct.
Incorrect Options
- Statement 1: The Chinese pilgrim Fa-Hien visited India during the reign of Gupta Emperor Chandragupta II (early 5th century CE). The Fourth Buddhist Council was convened by Kanishka in the 1st century CE, specifically in Kashmir. There is a chronological gap of several centuries between Fa-Hien's visit and the Fourth Buddhist Council, making his attendance impossible.
- Statement 2: The Chinese pilgrim Hiuen-Tsang (Xuanzang) visited India during the reign of Emperor Harsha (7th century CE). Hiuen-Tsang's accounts, particularly his work "Si-Yu-Ki," describe Harsha as a devout patron of Buddhism, especially the Mahayana school. Harsha is noted for his patronage of Buddhist institutions and for organizing grand religious assemblies, such as the one at Kanauj and the quinquennial assembly at Prayag, where he made significant donations to various religious sects, including Buddhists. Therefore, the statement that Harsha was antagonistic to Buddhism is incorrect.