The correct option is 2 only.
Explanation
The Lower Palaeolithic period in India is primarily characterized by the development of core stone tools such as handaxes, cleavers, and choppers. While these tools often exhibit symmetry and craftsmanship, the existence of distinct artistic expression during this epoch remains a subject of archaeological investigation.
Statement 1 is Incorrect: There is no abundant evidence of art objects produced by Lower Palaeolithic people in India. The earliest substantial evidence of art in India, particularly rock paintings (petroglyphs and pictographs), belongs to the Mesolithic period (e.g., Bhimbetka) and, to a lesser extent, the Upper Palaeolithic period (e.g., ostrich eggshell beads). The Lower Palaeolithic archaeological record is dominated by lithic assemblages rather than artistic artifacts.
Statement 2 is Correct: Due to the perishable nature of organic materials and the immense time depth, we do not possess definitive knowledge regarding whether Lower Palaeolithic humans produced art objects. While the symmetry of Acheulian handaxes suggests a developing aesthetic sense, no concrete "art objects" have been conclusively attributed to this specific period in the Indian context.
Key Takeaway: Prehistoric art in India, specifically rock paintings and decorative objects, is predominantly associated with the Mesolithic and Upper Palaeolithic periods, not the Lower Palaeolithic.