The correct option is (b).
Explanation
The English Education Act of 1835 was a significant policy decision by the British East India Company, led by Governor-General Lord William Bentinck. It resolved the "Anglicist vs. Orientalist" controversy regarding the allocation of educational funds and the medium of instruction in India.Statement-wise Analysis:
- Statement 1 is Incorrect. The Act was introduced following the recommendations of Thomas Babington Macaulay (Macaulay’s Minute, 1835), not James Mill. While James Mill was a utilitarian critic of Oriental learning, the specific 1835 policy was directly based on Macaulay’s arguments as the Law Member of the Governor-General’s Council.
- Statement 2 is Correct. The Act mandated that the government’s educational funds be utilized to promote European literature and science. Consequently, it established English as the medium of instruction for higher education, replacing Persian and Sanskrit in administrative and higher academic importance.
- Statement 3 is Incorrect. The Act represented a victory for the Anglicists and sought to diminish support for Oriental learning. It did not propose establishing new Oriental institutions; rather, it stopped the printing of Oriental books and reduced stipends for Oriental scholars. The Calcutta Madrasa was established much earlier, in 1781, by Warren Hastings.
Key Takeaway:
The English Education Act of 1835, driven by Macaulay’s Minute, shifted British policy toward the promotion of Western education and established English as the official medium of instruction for higher learning in India.