The correct option is The term is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution but is implicit in its provisions..
Explanation
Judicial Review is the power of the judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative enactments and executive orders of both the Central and State governments. It ensures that the organs of the state function within the limits prescribed by the Constitution.
Analysis of Options:
- The term is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution but is implicit in its provisions. is Correct: The phrase "Judicial Review" is nowhere explicitly mentioned in the text of the Constitution of India. However, the doctrine is an integral part of the constitutional framework and is derived from various provisions, primarily Article 13 (which declares laws inconsistent with Fundamental Rights as void), read with Articles 32 and 226.
- The term is explicitly defined in Article 32. is Incorrect: Article 32 provides the right to constitutional remedies and empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs. While this article is a tool for exercising judicial review, it does not define or explicitly state the term.
- It was added by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment. is Incorrect: The term was not added by the 42nd Amendment. Conversely, the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976) attempted to curtail the scope of judicial review, which was later restored by subsequent amendments and judicial pronouncements (e.g., Minerva Mills case).
- It is mentioned only in the Preamble. is Incorrect: The Preamble outlines the objectives of the Constitution (Justice, Liberty, Equality, Fraternity) but does not mention "Judicial Review".
Key Takeaway: While the specific term "Judicial Review" is absent from the Constitution, the power is explicitly conferred upon the judiciary through Article 13 and the writ jurisdictions under Articles 32 and 226. It is considered a part of the Basic Structure of the Constitution.