The correct option is 2 and 3 only.
Explanation
Mahatma Gandhi’s views on machinery were nuanced and often misunderstood. While he was a staunch critic of modern industrial civilization, his opposition was not to machinery
per se, but to the socio-economic consequences of its indiscriminate application, particularly in the Indian context of labor surplus.
Statement-wise Analysis
- Statement 1 is Incorrect. Gandhi did not seek to destroy all machinery. In Young India (1924), he explicitly stated, "How can I be [against all machinery] when I know that even this body is a most delicate piece of machinery?" He clarified that he was not fighting against machinery as such, but against the abuses associated with it.
- Statement 2 is Correct. Gandhi objected to the "craze" for machinery, specifically labor-saving devices in a country teeming with unemployed hands. He argued that machinery should not be used to displace human labor and concentrate wealth in the hands of a few, but rather to lighten the burden of the worker. He famously remarked, "Men go on 'saving labour' till thousands are without work and thrown on the open streets to die of starvation."
- Statement 3 is Correct. Gandhi considered the spinning wheel (Charkha) to be a piece of machinery. He often cited the Singer sewing machine and the Charkha as examples of beneficial machinery that aid the individual worker without exploiting them. He viewed the Charkha as a tool for economic independence and a "grand piece of machinery."
Key Takeaway
Gandhian View on Technology: Gandhi opposed
mass production (which concentrates wealth and displaces labor) but advocated for
production by the masses using appropriate, human-centric machinery like the Charkha.