The correct option is Appointments of Governors should be strictly non-partisan..
Explanation
The Sarkaria Commission was constituted in 1983 to examine and review the working of existing arrangements between the Union and the States. A significant portion of its recommendations focused on the office of the Governor to prevent the misuse of powers and to maintain federal balance.
Analysis of Recommendations:
- Appointments of Governors should be strictly non-partisan. is Correct: The Commission recommended that the Governor should be a "detached figure" and not intimately connected with the local politics of the State. It specified that the appointee should be an eminent person in some walk of life and should not have taken too great a part in politics generally, and particularly in the recent past. This ensures the appointment remains non-partisan.
- The post of Governor should be abolished to ensure state autonomy. is Incorrect: The Commission did not recommend abolishing the office of the Governor. It viewed the Governor as a vital link between the Centre and the State, provided the office is not misused.
- Governors should be elected directly by the people of the State. is Incorrect: The Commission did not suggest direct elections for the Governor. The Constituent Assembly had previously rejected this method to avoid power conflicts with the Chief Minister.
- Governors should be serving military officers to ensure discipline. is Incorrect: There was no recommendation mandating that Governors be serving military officers.
Key Takeaway: The Sarkaria Commission emphasized that a Governor should be an outsider to the respective state and a detached figure who has not been active in politics recently, ensuring the dignity and impartiality of the constitutional office.