The correct option is (a).
Explanation
The term 'Watan Jagir' refers to a specific land revenue assignment within the Mughal administrative framework. It was primarily a mechanism to integrate local chieftains and indigenous rulers into the Mughal nobility (Mansabdari system) while allowing them to retain control over their ancestral domains.
Statement-wise Analysis:
- Statement 1 is Correct: 'Watan Jagir' refers to the ancestral lands (Watan) of a ruler (typically a Rajput Raja or Zamindar) that were returned to them after they submitted to Mughal authority. Unlike ordinary Tankha Jagirs, which were transferable every few years, Watan Jagirs were hereditary and generally non-transferable. The revenue from these lands was assigned to the ruler as part of their salary for their rank (Mansab).
- Statement 2 is Incorrect: This mechanism was not used exclusively for Mughal princes. In fact, it was most characteristically used for Rajput rulers and other local chieftains who were absorbed into the Mughal service. While Mughal princes held high Mansabs and large Jagirs, the specific concept of 'Watan Jagir' was designed to accommodate regional rulers within the imperial structure without displacing them from their traditional seats of power.
- Statement 3 is Incorrect: The acceptance of a Watan Jagir signified the acceptance of Mughal suzerainty. The holder of a Watan Jagir was a servant of the Mughal state (Mansabdar), obligated to provide military service and pay tribute (peshkash) when required. It did not imply complete independence; rather, it represented internal autonomy subject to imperial oversight.
Key Takeaway:
Watan Jagirs were hereditary, non-transferable ancestral lands assigned to local rulers (mainly Rajputs) upon their submission to the Mughals, distinguishing them from the transferable Tankha Jagirs held by ordinary officials.