Correct Option
The correct option is (c) 1 and 3 only.
Explanation
The decline of the Mughal Empire in the 18th century led to the fragmentation of political authority. This resulted in the emergence of independent regional states, which can be broadly categorized into successor states (founded by Mughal governors), warrior states (Marathas, Sikhs, Jats), and independent kingdoms.
Statement-wise Analysis
- Statement 1 is Correct: As the central authority of the Mughal Emperor weakened, powerful governors (Subadars) and nobles consolidated their authority. They transformed their administrative positions into hereditary rule, effectively emerging as centers of power in regions such as Awadh, Bengal, and Hyderabad.
- Statement 2 is Incorrect: The provinces of Punjab and Kashmir did not witness the establishment of stable new dynasties by Mughal servants in the same manner as Awadh or Hyderabad. Instead, these regions faced severe instability due to foreign invasions (by Nadir Shah and Ahmad Shah Abdali) and the rise of local warrior groups like the Sikhs in Punjab. Kashmir eventually fell under Afghan rule.
- Statement 3 is Correct: The rulers of the successor states (such as the Nizams of Hyderabad and the Nawabs of Awadh and Bengal) established practical independence but maintained a formal, nominal allegiance to the Mughal Emperor. They continued to seek imperial titles and legitimacy from the Mughal court to validate their rule.
Key Takeaway
Successor States (Awadh, Bengal, Hyderabad) were formed by Mughal governors who retained nominal ties to the Emperor, whereas regions like Punjab saw the rise of insurgent groups (Sikhs) and foreign occupation rather than dynastic continuity by Mughal officials.