Consider the following statements regarding the expansion of the Maratha empire: 1. By the 1730s, the Maratha king was reduced to a puppet of the Nizam of Hyderabad. 2. The frontiers of Maratha domination expanded into Rajasthan, Punjab, Bengal, and Orissa. 3. These expanded regions were formally included in the Maratha empire and directly administered by the Peshwa. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

The correct option is (b). Explanation The expansion of the Maratha Confederacy during the 18th century, specifically under the Peshwas. This period marked the transition of the Marathas from a regional kingdom to a pan-Indian power, filling the political vacuum created by the decline of the Mughal Empire. Statement-wise Analysis: - Statement 1 is Incorrect. By the 1730s, the Maratha King (Chhatrapati Shahu) was not a puppet of the Nizam of Hyderabad. While the actual administrative and military power had shifted from the Chhatrapati to the Peshwa (Prime Minister) based in Pune, the Nizam was a rival power. The Marathas, under Peshwa Baji Rao I, engaged in frequent conflicts with the Nizam (e.g., Battle of Palkhed, 1728) and consistently defeated or contained him. The King was never a subordinate to the Nizam. - Statement 2 is Correct. Between 1720 and 1761, the Maratha empire expanded rapidly. Malwa and Gujarat were seized from the Mughals by the 1720s. By the 1730s, the Maratha king was recognized as the overlord of the entire Deccan peninsula. In the subsequent decades (1740s and 1750s), Maratha domination extended into the north (Rajasthan and Punjab) and the east (Bengal and Orissa). - Statement 3 is Incorrect. While the Marathas established dominance over Rajasthan, Punjab, Bengal, and Orissa, these regions were not formally included in the Maratha empire, nor were they directly administered by the Peshwa. Instead, they were made to pay tribute (Chauth and Sardeshmukhi) as a way of accepting Maratha sovereignty. Local rulers often retained their internal autonomy subject to these payments, or the regions were managed by semi-independent Maratha chiefs (Sardars) like the Scindias, Holkars, and Bhonsles, rather than the central administration in Pune. Key Takeaway: The Maratha expansion in the 18th century created a distinction between Swarajya (territories directly administered) and Mughlai (territories paying Chauth/tribute but not directly administered). Peripheral regions like Punjab and Bengal fell into the latter category.

NCERT Class 7 History — Chapter 8: Eighteenth-Century Political Formations

mcqmedium

Consider the following statements regarding the expansion of the Maratha empire:

By the 1730s, the Maratha king was reduced to a puppet of the Nizam of Hyderabad.
The frontiers of Maratha domination expanded into Rajasthan, Punjab, Bengal, and Orissa.
These expanded regions were formally included in the Maratha empire and directly administered by the Peshwa.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Official previous-year question

Verified 1 Aug 2026.

Options

A1 only
B2 only
C1 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3

Did you get this right?

Solution

The correct option is (b).

Explanation

The expansion of the Maratha Confederacy during the 18th century, specifically under the Peshwas. This period marked the transition of the Marathas from a regional kingdom to a pan-Indian power, filling the political vacuum created by the decline of the Mughal Empire.

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Incorrect. By the 1730s, the Maratha King (Chhatrapati Shahu) was not a puppet of the Nizam of Hyderabad. While the actual administrative and military power had shifted from the Chhatrapati to the Peshwa (Prime Minister) based in Pune, the Nizam was a rival power. The Marathas, under Peshwa Baji Rao I, engaged in frequent conflicts with the Nizam (e.g., Battle of Palkhed, 1728) and consistently defeated or contained him. The King was never a subordinate to the Nizam.
Statement 2 is Correct. Between 1720 and 1761, the Maratha empire expanded rapidly. Malwa and Gujarat were seized from the Mughals by the 1720s. By the 1730s, the Maratha king was recognized as the overlord of the entire Deccan peninsula. In the subsequent decades (1740s and 1750s), Maratha domination extended into the north (Rajasthan and Punjab) and the east (Bengal and Orissa).
Statement 3 is Incorrect. While the Marathas established dominance over Rajasthan, Punjab, Bengal, and Orissa, these regions were not formally included in the Maratha empire, nor were they directly administered by the Peshwa. Instead, they were made to pay tribute (Chauth and Sardeshmukhi) as a way of accepting Maratha sovereignty. Local rulers often retained their internal autonomy subject to these payments, or the regions were managed by semi-independent Maratha chiefs (Sardars) like the Scindias, Holkars, and Bhonsles, rather than the central administration in Pune.

Key Takeaway:
The Maratha expansion in the 18th century created a distinction between Swarajya (territories directly administered) and Mughlai (territories paying Chauth/tribute but not directly administered). Peripheral regions like Punjab and Bengal fell into the latter category.

Your note

More from Chapter 8: Eighteenth-Century Political Formations

Consider the following statements regarding the peasant and zamindari rebellions in northern and western India during the later Mughal period: 1. These revolts were exclusively caused by the pressures of mounting taxes imposed by the central authority. 2. Powerful chieftains sometimes used these rebellions to consolidate their own positions. 3. Unlike in the past, these groups were now able to seize the economic resources of the region to consolidate their positions. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

Who among the following invaded India in 1739 and carried away the Peacock Throne?

easy

Which of the following pairs of Later Mughal Emperors and their fate is correctly matched?

hard

Consider the following statements regarding the Rajput rulers in the eighteenth century: 1. Many Rajput kings were permitted to enjoy considerable autonomy in their watan jagirs. 2. Ajit Singh of Jodhpur held the governorship of Malwa. 3. Sawai Raja Jai Singh of Amber held the governorship of Gujarat. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

hard

Which Rajput state is known for its prolonged refusal to accept Mughal suzerainty under rulers like Rana Pratap?

easy

Keep practising Chapter 8: Eighteenth-Century Political Formations

Work through every question from this NCERT chapter.

Browse all NCERT Class 7 History chapters

The correct option is (b).

Explanation

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Incorrect. By the 1730s, the Maratha King (Chhatrapati Shahu) was not a puppet of the Nizam of Hyderabad. While the actual administrative and military power had shifted from the Chhatrapati to the Peshwa (Prime Minister) based in Pune, the Nizam was a rival power. The Marathas, under Peshwa Baji Rao I, engaged in frequent conflicts with the Nizam (e.g., Battle of Palkhed, 1728) and consistently defeated or contained him. The King was never a subordinate to the Nizam.
Statement 2 is Correct. Between 1720 and 1761, the Maratha empire expanded rapidly. Malwa and Gujarat were seized from the Mughals by the 1720s. By the 1730s, the Maratha king was recognized as the overlord of the entire Deccan peninsula. In the subsequent decades (1740s and 1750s), Maratha domination extended into the north (Rajasthan and Punjab) and the east (Bengal and Orissa).
Statement 3 is Incorrect. While the Marathas established dominance over Rajasthan, Punjab, Bengal, and Orissa, these regions were not formally included in the Maratha empire, nor were they directly administered by the Peshwa. Instead, they were made to pay tribute (Chauth and Sardeshmukhi) as a way of accepting Maratha sovereignty. Local rulers often retained their internal autonomy subject to these payments, or the regions were managed by semi-independent Maratha chiefs (Sardars) like the Scindias, Holkars, and Bhonsles, rather than the central administration in Pune.