The correct option is (c) 2 and 3 only.
Explanation
This question relates to the concept of Secularism and the relationship between the State and religion. In February 2004, France enacted a law banning students from wearing any conspicuous religious signs or symbols in public schools. This reflects the French model of secularism (Laïcité), which mandates a strict separation between religious expression and public institutions, contrasting with the Indian model of "principled distance."
Statement-wise Analysis:
- Statement 1 is Incorrect. The 2004 law did not promote the display of religious symbols; rather, it prohibited the wearing of conspicuous religious symbols or signs in public schools. This included Islamic headscarves, Jewish skullcaps, and large Christian crosses.
- Statement 2 is Correct. The enforcement of this law led to strict disciplinary actions. Many students who refused to remove their headscarves or other religious symbols were indeed expelled from their schools for violating the ban.
- Statement 3 is Correct. The law faced significant resistance and protests, particularly from immigrants from former French colonies such as Algeria, Tunisia, and Morocco. Religious groups argued that the ban infringed upon their right to religious freedom and cultural expression.
Key Takeaway:
The French model of secularism prohibits the public display of religious symbols in state institutions to maintain neutrality, whereas Indian secularism allows for the practice of religion (e.g., wearing turbans) while maintaining a principled distance from the State.