Correct Option (B)
The native state of Tripura became involved in the Freedom Movement early in the 20th century primarily because Bengal revolutionaries sought refuge within its borders. Tripura, being a princely state, offered a relatively safe haven for these revolutionaries who were actively involved in anti-British activities in British India, particularly Bengal. Their presence and activities influenced the local populace and administration, thereby integrating Tripura into the broader nationalist struggle.
Incorrect Options:
Option A: The kings of Tripura were not consistently anti-British. While some rulers might have had reservations, the general policy of princely states, including Tripura, was to maintain cordial relations with the British paramount power to preserve their autonomy. Direct opposition was rare and often led to annexation or deposition.
Option C: While the tribal communities in many regions exhibited strong resistance against colonial encroachment, attributing Tripura's early involvement in the Freedom Movement solely to the "fiercely freedom-loving" nature of its tribes is an oversimplification. The primary catalyst for its early involvement was the external influence of revolutionary groups.
Option D: There is no substantial historical evidence to suggest that significant groups were fighting against the kingship and its British protectors within Tripura during the early 20th century, leading to its involvement in the Freedom Movement. Internal dissent against the monarchy, if present, was not the primary driver for the state's early connection to the broader nationalist movement.