The correct option is B - 3 only.
[as per provisional answerkey]Why this is correct
The passage explicitly states that Grant’s act of napping was a surrender to "the body's quiet wisdom over society's relentless performance metrics." This directly supports Statement 3, as it highlights that Grant prioritized his physical need for rest (body's wisdom) over the societal expectation of remaining alert and performative in a public, high-profile setting (demands of society).
Why the other options are incorrect
- Statement 1 - Hugh Grant was watching the men's semifinal match: This is factually incorrect based on the passage. The text states he was watching the "men's singles quarterfinals," not the semifinals. In UPSC CSAT, such specific factual discrepancies make a statement false.
- Statement 2 - an act that is viewed with opprobrium: While the passage uses the tennis term "unexpected ace" to describe the nap, it does not view the act with "opprobrium" (harsh criticism or censure). On the contrary, the author uses positive and empathetic language, such as "praise be to Grant," "delicious moment," and "elegant case for surrender," indicating approval rather than condemnation.
- Option (a), (c), and (d): These options are incorrect because they include Statement 1 or Statement 2, both of which contain inaccuracies regarding the details or the tone of the passage.
Key Concept
Critical reading and tone analysis: distinguishing between specific factual details (quarterfinals vs. semifinals) and identifying the author's appreciative stance versus a critical one.