The correct option is D - 1, 2 and 3.
[as per provisional answerkey]Why this is correct
The passage explicitly supports the first three statements through direct mentions and logical inferences:
- Statement 1: The passage concludes by stating we need to develop a culture where sport is seen as a "way of life" to build a healthier society.
- Statement 2: The text mentions that children are "inactive and rarely leave the house" (seclusion) and that sport can help "tackle these problems," making this a valid conclusion.
- Statement 3: While the passage argues sport is more than just jobs, it acknowledges the reality of "getting jobs through a sports quota" as a functional aspect of sports in the very first sentence.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option (a) - 1 and 3 only: This option is incorrect because it excludes Statement 2. The passage specifically links sports to solving the problem of children being inactive and staying indoors, which directly relates to mitigating seclusion.
- Option (b) - 2 and 4 only: This option is incorrect because Statement 4 is factually contradicted by the passage. Furthermore, it excludes Statement 1, which is the central theme of the text.
- Option (c) - 1, 2 and 4: This option is incorrect because Statement 4 claims corporate skills cannot be learnt through sport. However, the passage explicitly states that one can learn "time management, teamwork, and coordination"-all of which are standard corporate/professional skills.
Key Concept
This question tests the ability to distinguish between the primary argument of a passage (sports as a way of life) and the secondary facts or contradictions presented within the text.