Correct Option (c)
The passage advocates for a fundamental re-evaluation of growth strategies, moving away from resource-intensive and environmentally damaging processes. It emphasizes that achieving steady, sufficient, and inclusive growth is contingent upon adopting more efficient and resource-frugal development models. Therefore, maintaining high environmental standards is presented as an essential prerequisite for sustainable economic progress, preventing both ecological degradation and socio-economic inequalities.
Incorrect Options:
Option (a): This statement posits environmental sustainability as being detrimental to achieving a high rate of GDP growth. However, the passage argues for integrating sustainability into growth models, suggesting that a revised approach to growth can align economic expansion with environmental protection, rather than creating an inherent conflict.
Option (b): This option incorrectly asserts that poverty eradication necessitates rapid economic growth accompanied by environmental degradation. The passage explicitly promotes "green growth" strategies, which aim to achieve both poverty reduction and environmental sustainability simultaneously, thereby refuting the notion that environmental harm is an unavoidable consequence of development.
Option (d): This statement presents a deterministic and pessimistic outlook, suggesting that environmental degradation and inequalities are inevitable given current global challenges. This contradicts the passage's central message, which calls for proactive strategic shifts towards resource-frugal development to prevent such outcomes and foster a more equitable and sustainable world.