Correct Option (A)
A national, pragmatic, legal, and policy framework for water allocation is the most appropriate action. The passage emphasizes that water is a State subject, yet conflicts arise over inter-State rivers. A national framework is essential to transcend individual State jurisdictions, providing a uniform, objective basis for water allocation among competing States and stakeholders. Such a framework would facilitate systematic planning, incorporate basin-based assessments, and ensure equitable distribution, thereby addressing the core issue of inter-State disputes and the need for a balanced approach.
Incorrect Options:
Option (B) All river systems of the country should be linked and huge aquifers created:
This option proposes a large-scale engineering solution that is generally considered impractical due to its immense cost, significant environmental risks, and complex political implications. It does not represent an immediate or easily implementable action for fair water allocation.
Option (C) Water channels between regions of water surplus and regions of water deficit should be created:
Similar to river interlinking, creating extensive water channels is a massive infrastructural undertaking with feasibility challenges at a national scale. Furthermore, this approach primarily focuses on physical transfer rather than addressing the fundamental issue of equitable allocation criteria and resolving inter-State conflicts, which is central to the passage's concern.
Option (D) To mitigate water crisis, water demand of sectors such as agriculture and industry should be reduced:
While reducing water demand in key sectors like agriculture and industry is crucial for water conservation and overall water security, it does not directly address the problem of equitable allocation among different stakeholders and States. The question specifically asks for an action to ensure fair and equitable allocation, which requires a framework for distribution rather than solely focusing on demand reduction.