Correct Option (B)
The passage highlights that just as science requires philosophy for direction and purpose, governance (politics) similarly needs philosophical depth to avoid becoming aimless and destructive. It draws a parallel between "aimless and individual seeking" in politics and the need for "total knowledge and perspective" provided by statesmanship (guided by philosophy). Therefore, a system where empirical statesmen are complemented by individuals grounded in learning and wisdom (representing philosophical insight) is presented as the rational and practical approach to effective governance.
Incorrect Options:
-
Option (A): While the passage emphasizes the importance of philosophical perspective and scientific method for governance, it does not explicitly state that all modern statesmen must be personally trained in both. The focus is on the integration of philosophy into the process of governance, not necessarily on the universal qualification of every individual statesman.
-
Option (C): The passage discusses the application of philosophy to science and governance. It does not address the reform of early education systems or the training of citizens from a young age in scientific method and philosophical thinking. This option introduces a scope not covered by the passage.
-
Option (D): The passage states that science needs philosophy for analysis, coordination, and goal-setting. However, it does not advocate that all scientists must also become philosophers. The requirement is for philosophy to guide and coordinate scientific endeavors, implying a collaborative or systemic integration rather than a merging of individual roles.