Correct Option (B)
The passage highlights that a sustained focus on increasing staple food production has resulted in the diminished production and consumption of indigenous, nutritious traditional crops. This shift has negatively impacted food and nutrition security. Furthermore, intensive monoculture agriculture practices are identified as contributing to the degradation of land, water, and the quality of food derived from them.
- Assumption 2: "Dependence on a few crops has negative consequences for human health and the ecosystem." This assumption is valid. The passage explicitly states that the focus on staple crops led to lower production and consumption of diverse nutritious foods, impacting food and nutrition security. It also notes that monoculture degrades land and water quality, affecting the ecosystem.
- Assumption 3: "Government policies regarding food planning need to incorporate nutritional security." This assumption is valid. The passage indicates that despite increased food grain production, the agriculture sector's focus on staples did not sufficiently address nutritional security, implying a necessity for policy reorientation towards comprehensive nutritional security.
Incorrect Options:
- Assumption 1: "To implement the Sustainable Development Goals and to achieve zero-hunger goal, monoculture agriculture practices are inevitable even if they do not address malnutrition." This assumption is invalid. The passage critiques monoculture agriculture for exacerbating food and nutrition security issues and degrading resources. It does not suggest that monoculture is an inevitable or necessary practice for achieving zero hunger or the Sustainable Development Goals; rather, it implies a need to move away from such practices.
- Assumption 4: "For the present monoculture agriculture practices, farmers receive subsidies in various ways and government offers remunerative prices for grains and therefore they do not tend to consider crop diversity." This assumption is invalid. While the passage discusses the dominance of staple crops, it does not provide information or imply that government subsidies or remunerative prices are the underlying reasons farmers do not consider crop diversity. This statement introduces external information not inferable from the provided text.