Correct Option (C)
The passage distinguishes between the perceived impact of individual actions on environmental issues and health problems. It states that individual efforts regarding environmental concerns are often seen as having a "negligible effect," leading to inertia. Conversely, for health, it explicitly mentions that "individual choices can make the difference between life and death, literally." This contrast implies that personal health outcomes are significantly influenced by individual decisions, irrespective of the broader state of environmental problems. Therefore, a rational assumption is that health can be safeguarded through personal choices even if environmental challenges persist without collective resolution.
Incorrect Options:
Option A: The passage does not discuss economic aspects such as spending on cure versus prevention. Its focus is on individual agency and collective inaction regarding environmental and health issues, not financial allocations within healthcare systems.
Option B: The passage emphasizes individual responsibility and choices in addressing both environmental and health problems. It highlights the perceived lack of individual impact on environmental issues and the lethargy in making personal health choices. It does not attribute the primary responsibility for solving these problems to the government.
Option D: The passage does not refer to traditional lifestyles, the influence of Western values, or any specific cultural shifts leading to unhealthy living. The discussion is general, focusing on the human tendency towards inaction despite the known benefits of lifestyle changes.