Correct Option (A)
The passage posits that while machine productivity can lead to a life of leisure, the true benefit and happiness derived from this leisure are contingent upon an educated populace. It explicitly states, "If a leisured population is to be happy, it must be an educated population." This implies that the full advantages of economic progress, particularly the leisure it affords, can only be optimally utilized and enjoyed by individuals equipped with intelligent activities and interests, which education fosters. Therefore, an educated population is essential to effectively leverage the benefits of economic advancement.
Incorrect Options:
The passage does not assert that all economic development should be solely directed towards the creation of leisure. Instead, it highlights that once leisure is created, its quality and utility are enhanced by education. The primary focus is on the meaningful utilization of leisure rather than its exclusive generation as the sole aim of economic development.
While the passage connects education to happiness in the context of leisure, it does not establish a direct, quantifiable cause-and-effect relationship where a mere increase in the educated population automatically leads to a proportionate increase in overall happiness. The emphasis is on the type of education (for enjoyment and intelligent activities) required for happiness in a leisured state, rather than a general correlation between educational attainment and happiness levels.
The passage acknowledges that the use of machines should lead to leisure but does not advocate for their encouragement solely to create a large leisured population. Its central argument is that if such a leisured population emerges, education becomes crucial to ensure that this leisure is not tedious but rather fulfilling and enjoyable. The encouragement of machines is presented as a means to productivity, which then necessitates education for the beneficial use of the resulting leisure.