Correct Option (c)
Statements 2, 3, and 5 accurately reflect the rational, plausible, and practical implications derivable from the passage.
- Statement 2: The passage illustrates how modern technologies, through examples like a driverless car's code written in California, maintained in Hyderabad, and operating in Dublin, transcend national economic and regulatory boundaries, thereby blurring them.
- Statement 3: The passage presents scenarios where technological advancements and the capital driving them create ethical and legal dilemmas (e.g., decision-making authority for autonomous systems) that challenge the traditional domain and regulatory capacity of the state.
- Statement 5: The passage explicitly discusses various ambiguities and uncertainties, including differing national jurisdictions, moral conundrums, and their implications for transnational insurance and investment, indicating that geopolitics must contend with these complexities.
Incorrect Options:
- Statement 1: The passage discusses the challenges and dilemmas arising from the global nature of new technologies but does not critique globalization itself or suggest it is not in the best interests of any country. The statement makes an absolute claim unsupported by the text.
- Statement 4: The passage focuses on identifying and exploring the ethical, legal, and jurisdictional dilemmas posed by emerging technologies. It does not propose policy solutions such as focusing on developing domestic supply chains.