Correct Option (C)
The passage highlights the pervasive integration of computers into physical objects and critical systems through the "Internet of Things" (IoT), ranging from vehicles to medical devices. It explicitly states that these interconnected systems are susceptible to hacking, demonstrated by remote control of cars and pacemakers, posing significant risks to physical safety and data integrity. Given this emerging landscape of widespread vulnerability and the potential for severe real-world consequences, the most critical inference is the imperative for stringent data security laws to govern and secure these increasingly interconnected and vulnerable systems.
Incorrect Options:
-
Option (A) Computers are not completely safe: While factually correct, this statement is too broad. The passage specifically focuses on the novel and critical cybersecurity challenges introduced by the embedding of computers in physical objects and human-centric devices via the IoT, which extends beyond the general safety concerns of traditional computing.
-
Option (B) Companies producing the software do not take cyber security seriously: The passage details existing vulnerabilities and the capabilities of hackers but does not explicitly attribute these issues to a lack of seriousness or negligence on the part of software-producing companies. This inference is an assumption not directly supported by the text.
-
Option (D) The present trend of communication technologies will affect our lives in future: This is a general observation that is undeniably true. However, it does not capture the specific and critical inference regarding the heightened cybersecurity risks and the consequent need for regulatory measures, which is the central concern emphasized by the passage in the context of IoT.