Correct Option
Both statements 1 and 2 are valid implications of the passage.
Statement 1: The passage highlights that the National Farmers Commission prioritizes genetic modification for incorporating resistance to drought, salinity, and other stresses. This emphasis indicates that these environmental factors pose significant threats to agricultural productivity. If GM technology, due to corporate interests, is not adequately directed towards addressing these critical stresses, it implies a potential for reduced food production and, consequently, a risk of food insecurity.
Statement 2: The passage identifies drought, salinity, and other stresses as critical challenges requiring genetic modification for agricultural resilience. The acknowledgment of these widespread environmental stressors, which can severely impact farming and livelihoods, suggests a broader need for robust mechanisms to manage and mitigate their effects. While the passage focuses on genetic modification as a technological solution, the inherent disruptive potential of these stresses implies a necessity for comprehensive preparedness, which includes strengthening disaster management capabilities to cope with agricultural and livelihood disruptions.