Correct Option
The passage explicitly states that historical injustice is complex, involving economic structures of exploitation, ideologies of discrimination, and modes of representation. It further notes that "one or the other wrong, generally discrimination, tends to acquire partial autonomy from others." This indicates that economic and social discrimination are not necessarily resolved in a simple causal sequence where the removal of one automatically leads to the removal of the other. Regarding the second assumption, the passage discusses the nature of historical wrongs and their resistance to repair, referencing "the history of repair in India." However, it does not mention or advocate for a "democratic polity" as the best or any specific way to repair historical wrongs. Therefore, neither of the assumptions can be validly inferred from the provided text.
Incorrect Options
Option 1 (1 only): This assumption is not valid. The passage describes historical injustice as encompassing various wrongs like economic deprivation and social discrimination, noting their overlap but also stating that "one or the other wrong, generally discrimination, tends to acquire partial autonomy from others." This suggests that social discrimination can persist or operate independently to some extent, even if economic discrimination is addressed, thus refuting a direct causal link where the removal of one guarantees the removal of the other.
Option 2 (2 only): This assumption is not valid. The passage focuses on the nature and complexity of historical injustices and their resistance to repair. While it mentions "the history of repair in India," it does not discuss or propose any specific political system, such as a democratic polity, as the optimal or preferred method for rectifying these wrongs. This assumption introduces information not supported by the text.
Option 3 (Both 1 and 2): This option is incorrect because, as explained, neither assumption 1 nor assumption 2 can be validly drawn from the information provided in the passage. The passage highlights the intricate and somewhat independent nature of different forms of injustice and does not discuss the role of a democratic polity in their repair.