Correct Option (C)
Rousseau's concept of the General Will, as presented in the passage, signifies the collective good or common interest of the community, distinct from the aggregation of individual private wills. The passage states that individuals "part his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the General will," indicating a surrender of individual interests to a unified, collective purpose. Each member becomes an "indivisible part of the whole," implying a moral and political unity directed towards the welfare of the entire body politic, rather than a mere sum of personal desires.
Incorrect Options:
-
Option (A) - the sum total of the private wills of the individuals: This is incorrect. Rousseau explicitly differentiated the General Will from the "Will of All," which he defined as the sum of private interests. The General Will, in contrast, aims at the common good and requires individuals to transcend their particularistic desires.
-
Option (B) - what is articulated by the elected representatives of the individuals: This is incorrect. Rousseau held that the General Will is inalienable and cannot be represented. It is the direct expression of the sovereign people's collective will, not a mediated articulation by representatives. For Rousseau, sovereignty resides directly with the people.
-
Option (D) - the material interests of the community: This is incorrect. While material well-being may be a component of the common good, the General Will is not limited to economic or material concerns. It encompasses a broader scope of moral, social, and political justice, aiming for the overall welfare and freedom of the community, which transcends purely economic considerations.