Correct Option (D)
The passage explicitly highlights deficiencies in governance and public administration stemming from a lack of effective accountability in civil services. It then proceeds to discuss the need for designing an effective framework for accountability, proposing "special measures" and "reforms" such as reviewing Articles 311 and 312, defining roles, creating statutory civil service boards, and promoting decentralization. This clearly indicates that the essential message is the identified need and scope for reforms to enhance civil service accountability.
Incorrect Options:
The passage states that the system for seeking accountability to society "has not worked out" and has led to "adverse consequences." This implies a failure in the mechanism of accountability to society, rather than a complete absence of it. The core issue presented is the imbalance between internal accountability to the political executive and external accountability to society, not a declaration that civil services are entirely unaccountable.
The passage focuses on the structure and functioning of civil services and their accountability mechanisms. It does not discuss the educational background, qualifications, or enlightenment levels of political leaders. Therefore, this option introduces an idea not supported or implied by the text.
The passage mentions that the framers of the Constitution "had envisaged" a civil service that would function in the larger public interest, protected by safeguards like Articles 311 and 312. It then notes that the emphasis has "tilted" over the years, leading to adverse consequences. This indicates a deviation from the framers' original intent due to the evolution of the system, rather than a failure on their part to anticipate all future problems. The framers' vision for an independent civil service is acknowledged.