Correct Option
The passage explicitly states that the ultimate aim of government is to "free every man from fear, that he may live in all possible security." This concept of "all possible security" encompasses not merely physical safety but also a comprehensive framework of social security. This includes the protection of natural rights, the absence of fear, and the creation of conditions conducive to the rational development of individuals' minds and bodies. Therefore, providing absolute social security, interpreted as comprehensive security against fear and injury, aligns directly with the primary concern articulated in the passage.
Incorrect Options
Option (a) is incorrect because the passage's focus is broader than just social and political freedom. While these are components of a secure and free existence, the text emphasizes a more encompassing idea of freeing individuals from fear and enabling them to live in "all possible security" without injury to themselves or others, and to develop their reason unshackled. This option narrows the scope of the government's aim too significantly.
Option (c) is incorrect as the passage does not advocate for absolute liberty in all matters of life. It qualifies liberty by stating that individuals should "exist and work without injury to himself or others." This implies a framework where liberty is balanced with responsibility and security, rather than being absolute and unrestricted. Unfettered liberty would contradict the stated need for governance to prevent injury and ensure security.
Option (d) is incorrect because while physical security is an integral part of the government's aim, the passage clearly extends beyond this singular aspect. It also highlights the importance of freeing individuals from fear, enabling the development of their minds and bodies in security, and allowing them to employ their reason unshackled. Thus, limiting the government's role solely to physical security provides an incomplete and narrow interpretation of the passage's message.