Correct Option
The passage primarily discusses historical justifications for restricting political governance to a select group of citizens, based on perceived differences in their capacities and for the purported good of society and political stability. The statement that "Man seeks control over external things affecting him" is a general observation about human interaction with the environment and does not directly contribute to the specific argument within the passage concerning the internal dynamics of political exclusion and the criteria for governing within a society. Therefore, it is the least essential component of the argument presented.
Incorrect Options
-
Option (B): In society, there are 'super' and 'sub' human beings. The passage states that "human beings may be rightfully segregated for the good of society and viability of the political process." This directly implies a hierarchical classification of individuals, where some are deemed more capable or suitable for governance than others, thus aligning with the concept of 'super' and 'sub' human beings in the context of political rights and roles. This statement is essential to the argument.
-
Option (C): Exceptions to universal citizen participation are conducive to systemic efficacy. The passage explicitly justifies "Exclusion of the many" on the grounds of "the good of society and viability of the political process." This directly supports the idea that limiting participation (creating exceptions to universal citizen participation) is considered beneficial for the political system's effectiveness and stability (systemic efficacy). This statement is essential to the argument.
-
Option (D): Governing implies recognition of disparities in individual capacities. The passage refers to "claims and theories confining the right of governing to a few select citizens" and the justification for such segregation. This inherently suggests that the basis for such confinement and segregation is the belief that individuals possess differing capacities, making some more suitable for governance than others. This recognition of disparities is a fundamental premise for the arguments presented in the passage. This statement is essential to the argument.