Correct Option (B)
The passage strongly advocates for the governance of administrative actions by a framework of recognised rules and principles. It underscores the necessity of establishing safeguards to prevent the misuse of discretionary power, even in instances where governmental actions may impinge upon individual rights for the larger public interest, provided such actions are duly authorized by Parliament. The core argument is for devising systems that minimise, if not prevent, the abuse of discretion, ensuring that decisions are consistent and predictable. This directly supports the assumption that the supremacy of rules and safeguards should prevail over exclusive discretionary authority.
Incorrect Options:
Option (A): The passage explicitly argues against the notion of unlimited discretionary power. It states that "discretionary powers to the administration can be done away with" and emphasizes the critical need for rules and safeguards where discretion is unavoidable, directly contradicting the idea of always granting wide discretionary power.
Option (C): The passage does not assert that wider discretionary power is essential for parliamentary democracy. Instead, it focuses on the imperative to limit and regulate such power within a parliamentary framework through established rules and safeguards, advocating for controlled discretion rather than broad authority for democratic functioning.
Option (D): As option (B) is a logical assumption directly supported by the content and intent of the passage, this option is incorrect.