Correct Option (4)
The passage explicitly states that if a child's right to education is denied, "no compensation offered later can be adequate or relevant" because "childhood does not last." It further elaborates that "the opportunity missed at school during childhood cannot serve the same purpose later in life." This collectively infers that education acquired during childhood is unique and irreplaceable, and there is no sufficient substitute for it if missed during that critical period.
Incorrect Options:
- Option 1: The statement "The society has a tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls" is directly mentioned in the passage: "Tenacious prejudice against the intellectual potential of girls runs across our cultural diversity..." An inference must be a conclusion drawn from the text, not a direct quotation or explicit statement.
- Option 2: The passage clearly states, "In all cases, it is the adult society which must act on behalf of the child." This directly contradicts the assertion that adults cannot be relied upon to fight for children's Right to Education.
- Option 3: While the passage discusses the potential futility of a legal battle won eventually due to the transient nature of childhood, it does not provide information or imply that such legal fights are generally "prohibitive" in terms of cost. The focus is on the timing and irreplaceable nature of childhood education, not the financial burden of litigation.