Correct Option (D)
Neither statement 1 nor statement 2 can be inferred from the provided passage.
- Statement 1 asserts that the Right to Education is a legal right and not a fundamental right. The passage states that this right is "enshrined in the Constitution" and is "different from the others enshrined in the Constitution." However, the passage does not explicitly define the Right to Education as exclusively a legal right or differentiate it from a fundamental right in the manner stated. The text provides insufficient information to confirm or deny this specific classification.
- Statement 2 proposes that the education system in the country must be made identical to that of developed countries to achieve universal education. The passage discusses the challenges and peculiarities of the Right to Education in India, including societal issues like female foeticide and prejudice against girls' intellectual potential. It does not, however, make any comparison with the education systems of developed countries or suggest that an identical model is necessary for universal education. This statement introduces an external comparison not supported by the text.
Incorrect Options:
Options A, B, and C are incorrect because neither of the statements is supported by the passage.
- Option A (1 only) is incorrect because statement 1 cannot be definitively concluded from the passage. While the passage mentions the right is "enshrined in the Constitution" and discusses "legal battle," it does not explicitly classify it as solely a legal right and not a fundamental right.
- Option B (2 only) is incorrect because statement 2 is an assertion not present or implied in the passage. The passage focuses on the internal challenges and nature of the Right to Education in India, without reference to or comparison with developed countries' education systems.
- Option C (Both 1 and 2) is incorrect as both statements are unsubstantiated by the information provided in the passage.