The correct option is
2 only
Explanation
The story of Ekalavya and Drona appears in the Adi Parva of the Mahabharata. It reflects the rigid social hierarchy (Varna system) and the strict norms governing the Guru-Shishya tradition during the Epic period.
Statement 1 is Incorrect:
Drona did not refuse to teach Ekalavya merely because he did not belong to the Kuru lineage. The primary reason cited in the text is that Ekalavya belonged to the Nishada tribe (a forest-dwelling community considered low in the social hierarchy). Drona, being a Brahmin teacher employed by the royal Kuru house, adhered to the social norms that restricted advanced military training (specifically archery of the highest order) to Kshatriyas or royalty. Additionally, Drona wished to uphold his promise to make Arjuna the greatest archer in the world.
Statement 2 is Correct:
Despite being rejected, Ekalavya practiced archery before a clay statue of Drona. When Drona later discovered that Ekalavya’s skill surpassed that of Arjuna, he demanded Ekalavya's right thumb as guru dakshina (fee). Ekalavya unhesitatingly cut off his thumb and offered it, thereby sacrificing his ability to be the supreme archer.
Key Takeaway:
The episode highlights the entrenchment of caste-based discrimination (exclusion of Nishadas) and the absolute devotion expected in the Guru-Shishya parampara during the later Vedic/Epic age.