With reference to the debates on separate electorates in the Constituent Assembly, consider the following statements: 1. B. Pocker Bahadur argued that separate electorates were necessary to ensure Muslims had a meaningful voice. 2. Govind Ballabh Pant supported separate electorates as a mechanism to integrate minorities into the nation. 3. Sardar Patel argued that separate electorates were the only way to ensure minority representation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

The correct option is 1 only Explanation The debate on separate electorates in the Constituent Assembly (1947-1949) was a pivotal moment in defining the nature of Indian democracy. While some minority representatives argued for their continuation to ensure political voice, the majority of the nationalist leadership opposed them, viewing separate electorates as a colonial tool that fostered division and led to the Partition. Statement-wise Analysis: - Statement 1 is Correct: B. Pocker Bahadur, a member from Madras, made a strong plea for the continuation of separate electorates. He argued that the needs of Muslims could not be properly understood by non-Muslims and that separate electorates were the only way to ensure that Muslims had a genuine voice in the legislature. - Statement 2 is Incorrect: Govind Ballabh Pant declared that separate electorates were not only harmful to the nation but also "suicidal to the minorities." He argued that separate electorates would permanently isolate the minorities, prevent them from integrating into the mainstream, and render them a permanently segregated community within the nation. He advocated for joint electorates to foster national unity. - Statement 3 is Incorrect: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel vehemently opposed separate electorates. He famously stated that separate electorates were a "poison that has entered the body politic of our country," causing communal hatred and ultimately the Partition of India. He argued that with the British gone, the "mischief" of separate electorates should also be discarded. Key Takeaway: The Constituent Assembly ultimately rejected separate electorates, adopting joint electorates to ensure a unified political community, while providing reservation of seats only for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to address social backwardness.

NCERT Class 12 History — Chapter 4: Framing the Constitution - The Beginning of a New Era

mcqmedium

With reference to the debates on separate electorates in the Constituent Assembly, consider the following statements:

B. Pocker Bahadur argued that separate electorates were necessary to ensure Muslims had a meaningful voice.
Govind Ballabh Pant supported separate electorates as a mechanism to integrate minorities into the nation.
Sardar Patel argued that separate electorates were the only way to ensure minority representation.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Official previous-year question

Verified 1 Aug 2026.

Options

A1 and 3 only
B1, 2 and 3
C1 only
D2 only

Did you get this right?

Solution

The correct option is
1 only

Explanation

The debate on separate electorates in the Constituent Assembly (1947-1949) was a pivotal moment in defining the nature of Indian democracy. While some minority representatives argued for their continuation to ensure political voice, the majority of the nationalist leadership opposed them, viewing separate electorates as a colonial tool that fostered division and led to the Partition.

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Correct: B. Pocker Bahadur, a member from Madras, made a strong plea for the continuation of separate electorates. He argued that the needs of Muslims could not be properly understood by non-Muslims and that separate electorates were the only way to ensure that Muslims had a genuine voice in the legislature.
Statement 2 is Incorrect: Govind Ballabh Pant declared that separate electorates were not only harmful to the nation but also "suicidal to the minorities." He argued that separate electorates would permanently isolate the minorities, prevent them from integrating into the mainstream, and render them a permanently segregated community within the nation. He advocated for joint electorates to foster national unity.
Statement 3 is Incorrect: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel vehemently opposed separate electorates. He famously stated that separate electorates were a "poison that has entered the body politic of our country," causing communal hatred and ultimately the Partition of India. He argued that with the British gone, the "mischief" of separate electorates should also be discarded.

Key Takeaway:
The Constituent Assembly ultimately rejected separate electorates, adopting joint electorates to ensure a unified political community, while providing reservation of seats only for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes to address social backwardness.

Your note

More from Chapter 4: Framing the Constitution - The Beginning of a New Era

With reference to the "Objectives Resolution" introduced in the Constituent Assembly, consider the following statements: 1. It was moved by Jawaharlal Nehru on 13 December 1946. 2. It proclaimed India to be an "Independent Sovereign Republic". 3. It promised adequate safeguards for minorities, backward and tribal areas, and depressed classes. 4. It explicitly declared that India would follow the American model of democracy. How many of the statements given above are correct?

medium

Consider the following statements regarding the composition and nature of the Constituent Assembly of India: 1. The members were elected on the basis of universal adult franchise. 2. The Muslim League chose to boycott the Assembly to press for a separate Pakistan. 3. Initially, the Socialists kept away from the Assembly, believing it was a British creation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

With reference to the language controversy in the Constituent Assembly, consider the following statements: 1. Mahatma Gandhi advocated for Hindustani as the national language. 2. R.V. Dhulekar argued that English should be the sole language of constitution-making. 3. The Language Committee decided that English would continue to be used for official purposes for fifteen years. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

Which of the following events occurred during the years immediately preceding the making of the Constitution 1945-1947? 1. The Rising of the ratings of the Royal Indian Navy occurred in 1942. 2. The Great Calcutta Killings. 3. The Workers' movements and strikes in various cities. Select the correct answer using the code given below:

medium

Who among the following was NOT a member of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution?

easy

Keep practising Chapter 4: Framing the Constitution - The Beginning of a New Era

Work through every question from this NCERT chapter.

Browse all NCERT Class 12 History chapters

The correct option is
1 only

Explanation

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Correct: B. Pocker Bahadur, a member from Madras, made a strong plea for the continuation of separate electorates. He argued that the needs of Muslims could not be properly understood by non-Muslims and that separate electorates were the only way to ensure that Muslims had a genuine voice in the legislature.
Statement 2 is Incorrect: Govind Ballabh Pant declared that separate electorates were not only harmful to the nation but also "suicidal to the minorities." He argued that separate electorates would permanently isolate the minorities, prevent them from integrating into the mainstream, and render them a permanently segregated community within the nation. He advocated for joint electorates to foster national unity.
Statement 3 is Incorrect: Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel vehemently opposed separate electorates. He famously stated that separate electorates were a "poison that has entered the body politic of our country," causing communal hatred and ultimately the Partition of India. He argued that with the British gone, the "mischief" of separate electorates should also be discarded.