How did the Partition of India influence the debate on the powers of the Centre in the Constituent Assembly? 1. It led most nationalists to change their earlier position favoring decentralization. 2. The violence convinced leaders that a weak Centre was necessary to prevent authoritarianism. 3. It reinforced the argument for a strong Centre within a federal framework. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

The correct option is 1 and 3 only. Explanation The debate on the nature of the Indian federation in the Constituent Assembly was heavily influenced by the political reality of the time. Initially, under the Cabinet Mission Plan (1946), the Congress had accepted a federal structure with a weak Centre and autonomous provinces to accommodate the Muslim League and prevent the partition of India. However, the announcement of the Partition (Mountbatten Plan, June 1947) fundamentally altered this perspective. Statement-wise Analysis - Statement 1 is Correct. Prior to the Partition, the Congress leadership had reluctantly agreed to a decentralized structure with limited powers for the Centre (Defense, Foreign Affairs, and Communications) to preserve the unity of India. Once Partition became a reality, the political compulsion to appease the Muslim League disappeared. Consequently, most nationalists shifted their stance, arguing that a centralized system was now feasible and necessary for national consolidation. - Statement 2 is Incorrect. The communal violence and chaos accompanying the Partition did not advocate for a weak Centre; rather, it had the opposite effect. The breakdown of law and order convinced the leaders that a weak central authority would be incapable of maintaining peace or preventing anarchy. They concluded that only a strong Centre could effectively curb communal violence and administrative disorder. - Statement 3 is Correct. The trauma of Partition, combined with the challenge of integrating princely states, reinforced the argument for a strong Centre. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and B.R. Ambedkar argued that a strong Centre was essential to prevent fissiparous tendencies, ensure economic planning, and maintain the unity and integrity of the newly independent nation. This led to a federal structure with a strong unitary bias. Key Takeaway The Partition of India removed the political necessity of a weak Centre (intended to keep the Muslim League in a united India) and highlighted the dangers of instability, leading the Constituent Assembly to opt for a strong Centre within the federal framework.

How did the Partition of India influence… - NCERT Class 12 History MCQ

NCERT Class 12 History — Chapter 4: Framing the Constitution - The Beginning of a New Era

mcqmedium

How did the Partition of India influence the debate on the powers of the Centre in the Constituent Assembly?

It led most nationalists to change their earlier position favoring decentralization.
The violence convinced leaders that a weak Centre was necessary to prevent authoritarianism.
It reinforced the argument for a strong Centre within a federal framework.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

NCERT textbook question

From NCERT Themes in Indian History - 3 · Page 336

Options

A1 and 2 only
B1 and 3 only
C2 only
D1, 2 and 3

Did you get this right?

Solution

The correct option is 1 and 3 only.

Explanation

The debate on the nature of the Indian federation in the Constituent Assembly was heavily influenced by the political reality of the time. Initially, under the Cabinet Mission Plan (1946), the Congress had accepted a federal structure with a weak Centre and autonomous provinces to accommodate the Muslim League and prevent the partition of India. However, the announcement of the Partition (Mountbatten Plan, June 1947) fundamentally altered this perspective.

Statement-wise Analysis

Statement 1 is Correct. Prior to the Partition, the Congress leadership had reluctantly agreed to a decentralized structure with limited powers for the Centre (Defense, Foreign Affairs, and Communications) to preserve the unity of India. Once Partition became a reality, the political compulsion to appease the Muslim League disappeared. Consequently, most nationalists shifted their stance, arguing that a centralized system was now feasible and necessary for national consolidation.
Statement 2 is Incorrect. The communal violence and chaos accompanying the Partition did not advocate for a weak Centre; rather, it had the opposite effect. The breakdown of law and order convinced the leaders that a weak central authority would be incapable of maintaining peace or preventing anarchy. They concluded that only a strong Centre could effectively curb communal violence and administrative disorder.
Statement 3 is Correct. The trauma of Partition, combined with the challenge of integrating princely states, reinforced the argument for a strong Centre. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and B.R. Ambedkar argued that a strong Centre was essential to prevent fissiparous tendencies, ensure economic planning, and maintain the unity and integrity of the newly independent nation. This led to a federal structure with a strong unitary bias.

Key Takeaway

The Partition of India removed the political necessity of a weak Centre (intended to keep the Muslim League in a united India) and highlighted the dangers of instability, leading the Constituent Assembly to opt for a strong Centre within the federal framework.

Your note

More from Chapter 4: Framing the Constitution - The Beginning of a New Era

Who among the following was NOT a member of the Drafting Committee of the Constitution?

easy

"The Constituent Assembly was dominated by one party." With reference to this, consider the following statements: 1. The Congress held only 40 % of the seats in the Assembly. 2. The Congress members held diverse views on issues ranging from landlordism to socialism. 3. The discussions were influenced by public opinion and criticisms in the press. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

"It is the citizen that must count. It is the citizen that forms the base as well as the summit of the social pyramid." Who made this statement in the Constituent Assembly?

medium

With reference to the concept of secularism in the Indian Constitution, consider the following statements: 1. The Preamble contained a ringing pronouncement of secularism when it was first framed. 2. The State sought to distance itself from religious communities by banning compulsory religious instructions in State-run schools. 3. The Constitution strictly prohibited the State from interfering in religious customs for social reform. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

Who among the following was a woman member of the Constituent Assembly from Madras?

medium

Keep practising Chapter 4: Framing the Constitution - The Beginning of a New Era

Work through every question from this NCERT chapter.

Browse all NCERT Class 12 History chapters