The correct option is The Amendment procedure.
Explanation
In a parliamentary democracy, the "sovereignty of elected representatives" refers to the principle that the legislature, representing the will of the people, possesses the authority to enact laws and alter the Constitution. In the Indian context, this principle is the theoretical foundation for the Parliament's power to amend the Constitution under Article 368.Analysis:
- The Amendment procedure The Amendment procedure: Correct. The power to amend the Constitution is derived from the logic that the Constitution must be dynamic and capable of adaptation by the people's representatives. The argument for "Parliamentary Sovereignty" asserts that since Parliament represents the sovereign will of the people, it should have the power to amend any part of the Constitution.
- The Basic Structure doctrine The Basic Structure doctrine: Incorrect. This doctrine acts as a limitation on the sovereignty of elected representatives. It establishes that while Parliament has the power to amend, it cannot alter the core identity or "basic features" of the Constitution.
- The Judicial Review power The Judicial Review power: Incorrect. Judicial Review is the power of the Judiciary to examine the constitutionality of legislative and executive actions. It serves as a check on the sovereignty of elected representatives rather than being based on it.
- The Fundamental Duties The Fundamental Duties: Incorrect. Fundamental Duties (Article 51A) are moral and civic obligations of citizens. They are not directly based on the concept of the sovereignty of elected representatives.
Key Takeaway:
The "sovereignty of elected representatives" justifies the constituent power of Parliament to amend the Constitution (Article 368), whereas the Basic Structure doctrine and Judicial Review serve as checks to ensure this power is not misused to destroy the Constitution's essence.