Consider the following statements regarding the stability of constitutions in different nations: 1. The Soviet Union utilized a single constitution…

Correct Option

The correct option is 2 and 3 only.

Explanation

The stability and longevity of a constitution depend on its legitimacy, adaptability, and the political history of the nation. While some nations have frequently replaced their constitutions due to political upheavals, others have maintained a single operational framework over decades.

Statement 1 is Incorrect

The Soviet Union did not utilize a single constitution throughout its existence. It adopted four different constitutions in 1918, 1924, 1936, and 1977, reflecting shifts in leadership and ideology during the communist rule.

Statement 2 is Correct

France has a history of frequent constitutional changes. The Fifth French Republic was established in 1958 with the adoption of a new constitution, led by General Charles de Gaulle, replacing the constitution of the Fourth Republic.

Statement 3 is Correct

The Constitution of India has remained the sole operational framework of governance since its full implementation on January 26, 1950. Despite undergoing more than 100 amendments to address changing needs, the original document continues to function as the supreme law of the land.

Key Takeaway

The Indian Constitution is a rare example of endurance in a diverse democracy, standing in contrast to nations like the Soviet Union (multiple constitutions) or France (multiple republics and constitutions).