Consider the following statements regarding the punishment for violating the ban on child labour under the 2016 Amendment Act: 1. The jail term for violating the Act can range from six months to two years. 2. The fine imposed for the violation is limited to a maximum of ₹10,000. 3. The penalty is applicable only to factories employing more than 100 workers. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

The correct option is (a). Explanation Article 24 of the Constitution prohibits the employment of children in factories, mines, or hazardous employment. To enforce this Fundamental Right and align with the Right to Education Act, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 was enacted. This amendment significantly strengthened the penal provisions for employing children and adolescents in contravention of the law. Statement-wise Analysis: - Statement 1 is Correct: The 2016 Amendment enhanced the punishment for employers violating the Act. It prescribes imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years. Under the previous 1986 Act, the minimum imprisonment was three months. - Statement 2 is Incorrect: The amendment increased the monetary penalty to serve as a stronger deterrent. The fine now ranges from ₹20,000 to ₹50,000. The statement claiming the fine is limited to a maximum of ₹10,000 is factually wrong; ₹10,000 was the minimum fine under the unamended 1986 Act. - Statement 3 is Incorrect: The penalty provisions apply to any person who employs a child or adolescent in contravention of the Act. The application of the law is not restricted by the size of the establishment or the number of workers (e.g., 100 workers). It applies universally to all employers falling under the purview of the Act. Key Takeaway: The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 made the offence of employing a child cognizable. The punishment includes imprisonment of 6 months to 2 years and/or a fine of ₹20,000 to ₹50,000.

NCERT Class 8 Political Science — Chapter 6: Law and Social Justice

mcqhard

Consider the following statements regarding the punishment for violating the ban on child labour under the 2016 Amendment Act:

The jail term for violating the Act can range from six months to two years.
The fine imposed for the violation is limited to a maximum of ₹10,000.
The penalty is applicable only to factories employing more than 100 workers.

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Official previous-year question

Verified 1 Aug 2026.

Options

A1 only
B2 only
C1 and 3 only
D1, 2 and 3

Did you get this right?

Solution

The correct option is (a).

Explanation

Article 24 of the Constitution prohibits the employment of children in factories, mines, or hazardous employment. To enforce this Fundamental Right and align with the Right to Education Act, the Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 was enacted. This amendment significantly strengthened the penal provisions for employing children and adolescents in contravention of the law.

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Correct: The 2016 Amendment enhanced the punishment for employers violating the Act. It prescribes imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years. Under the previous 1986 Act, the minimum imprisonment was three months.
Statement 2 is Incorrect: The amendment increased the monetary penalty to serve as a stronger deterrent. The fine now ranges from ₹20,000 to ₹50,000. The statement claiming the fine is limited to a maximum of ₹10,000 is factually wrong; ₹10,000 was the minimum fine under the unamended 1986 Act.
Statement 3 is Incorrect: The penalty provisions apply to any person who employs a child or adolescent in contravention of the Act. The application of the law is not restricted by the size of the establishment or the number of workers (e.g., 100 workers). It applies universally to all employers falling under the purview of the Act.

Key Takeaway:
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 made the offence of employing a child cognizable. The punishment includes imprisonment of 6 months to 2 years and/or a fine of ₹20,000 to ₹50,000.

Your note

More from Chapter 6: Law and Social Justice

Consider the following statements regarding the regulation of markets and economic interactions: 1. Laws are enacted solely to protect the profit margins of producers without regard for consumers. 2. State intervention is often required in markets to prevent the exploitation of vulnerable groups. 3. The chain of markets linking producers to buyers involves buying and selling at every step. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

With reference to the concept of 'Minimum Wages' in India, consider the following 1. The primary objective of the minimum wage law is to ensure that workers are not underpaid by their employers. 2. Once set, the minimum wages remain fixed for a period of ten years to ensure stability. 3. This law is intended to protect the interests of various types of workers, including farm labourers. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

In the context of the Indian textile industry, 'Power Looms' are best described as:

medium

With reference to the role of Workers' Unions, consider the following statements: 1. They allow workers to use combined power to demand better working conditions. 2. They are strictly prohibited by law in the informal sector such as domestic work. 3. They facilitate bargaining for fair wages. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

medium

In the framework of governmental functions, which term refers to ensuring that laws enacted by the legislature are implemented and complied with?

easy

Keep practising Chapter 6: Law and Social Justice

Work through every question from this NCERT chapter.

Browse all NCERT Class 8 Political Science chapters

The correct option is (a).

Explanation

Statement-wise Analysis:

Statement 1 is Correct: The 2016 Amendment enhanced the punishment for employers violating the Act. It prescribes imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than six months but which may extend to two years. Under the previous 1986 Act, the minimum imprisonment was three months.
Statement 2 is Incorrect: The amendment increased the monetary penalty to serve as a stronger deterrent. The fine now ranges from ₹20,000 to ₹50,000. The statement claiming the fine is limited to a maximum of ₹10,000 is factually wrong; ₹10,000 was the minimum fine under the unamended 1986 Act.
Statement 3 is Incorrect: The penalty provisions apply to any person who employs a child or adolescent in contravention of the Act. The application of the law is not restricted by the size of the establishment or the number of workers (e.g., 100 workers). It applies universally to all employers falling under the purview of the Act.