Correct Option
Two of the given pairs are correctly matched.
-
Pair 1: Unauthorized wearing of police or military uniforms - The Official Secrets Act, 1923
This pair is correctly matched. Section 3(c) of The Official Secrets Act, 1923, along with other relevant provisions, criminalizes the unauthorized wearing of police or military uniforms. This is particularly applicable when such actions occur near "prohibited places" or are intended to impersonate an officer to obtain classified information or obstruct official duties.
-
Pair 3: Celebratory gunfire which can endanger the personal safety of others - The Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019
This pair is correctly matched. The Arms (Amendment) Act, 2019, introduced specific provisions to penalize celebratory gunfire that endangers human life or personal safety. This offence carries a punishment of imprisonment for up to two years, a fine of up to ₹1 lakh, or both.
Incorrect Options
-
Pair 2: Knowingly misleading interfering with a police officer or military officer when engaged in their duties - The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
This pair is incorrectly matched. The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, primarily deals with the rules governing the admissibility of evidence in judicial proceedings. Offences related to knowingly misleading or interfering with a police or military officer engaged in their duties are typically covered under other statutes, such as the Indian Penal Code, 1860, or potentially the Official Secrets Act, 1923, depending on the specific circumstances, but not the Indian Evidence Act.
-
This is incorrect as two pairs (1 and 3) are correctly matched.
-
This is incorrect because Pair 2 is not correctly matched.
-
This is incorrect as two pairs are correctly matched.