Consider the following statements : 1. Statement-I : In India, prisons are managed by State Governments with their own rules and regulations for the day-to-day administration of prisons. 2. Statement-II : In India, prisons are governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 which expressly kept the subject of prisons in the control of Provincial Governments. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

The correct option is Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I. Explanation The administration of prisons in India operates within a well-defined constitutional and legislative framework. Prisons fall under Entry 4 of the State List (List II) of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, making it an exclusive subject of State legislation and administration. - Statement-I — Correct In India, prisons are managed by the respective State Governments. Each State has the authority to frame its own rules and regulations for the day-to-day internal administration of prisons — covering matters such as prisoner classification, discipline, diet, labour, and medical care. This administrative autonomy is a direct consequence of prisons being a State subject under the constitutional scheme. - Statement-II — Correct The Prisons Act, 1894 is the principal central legislation governing prisons in India. This Act, enacted during British rule, expressly vested control over prisons with the Provincial (now State) Governments. It provides the broad framework — including rules relating to custody, treatment, and discipline of prisoners — while leaving operational administration to the States. The Act has not been comprehensively replaced and continues to serve as the foundational statute, supplemented by State-specific Prison Manuals. Statement-II directly explains the legal and legislative basis for Statement-I. The reason State Governments manage prisons with their own rules is precisely because the Prisons Act, 1894 placed this subject under provincial/state control — a position further entrenched in the Constitution through the State List. Thus, Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I. Key Takeaway: Prisons are a State subject under Entry 4 of List II of the Seventh Schedule; the Prisons Act, 1894 is the foundational legislation that vested control of prisons with Provincial/State Governments, forming the legal basis for State-level prison administration in India.

IAS 2023 — Political Science Indian Polity

2023mcqmedium

Consider the following statements :

Statement-I : In India, prisons are managed by State Governments with their own rules and regulations for the day-to-day administration of prisons.
Statement-II : In India, prisons are governed by the Prisons Act, 1894 which expressly kept the subject of prisons in the control of Provincial Governments.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Official previous-year question

Verified 2 Aug 2026.

Options

ABoth Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I
BBoth Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I
CStatement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect
DStatement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct

Did you get this right?

Solution

The correct option is Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.

Explanation

The administration of prisons in India operates within a well-defined constitutional and legislative framework. Prisons fall under Entry 4 of the State List (List II) of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India, making it an exclusive subject of State legislation and administration.

Statement-I — Correct
In India, prisons are managed by the respective State Governments. Each State has the authority to frame its own rules and regulations for the day-to-day internal administration of prisons — covering matters such as prisoner classification, discipline, diet, labour, and medical care. This administrative autonomy is a direct consequence of prisons being a State subject under the constitutional scheme.
Statement-II — Correct
The Prisons Act, 1894 is the principal central legislation governing prisons in India. This Act, enacted during British rule, expressly vested control over prisons with the Provincial (now State) Governments. It provides the broad framework — including rules relating to custody, treatment, and discipline of prisoners — while leaving operational administration to the States. The Act has not been comprehensively replaced and continues to serve as the foundational statute, supplemented by State-specific Prison Manuals.

Statement-II directly explains the legal and legislative basis for Statement-I. The reason State Governments manage prisons with their own rules is precisely because the Prisons Act, 1894 placed this subject under provincial/state control — a position further entrenched in the Constitution through the State List. Thus, Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.

Key Takeaway: Prisons are a State subject under Entry 4 of List II of the Seventh Schedule; the Prisons Act, 1894 is the foundational legislation that vested control of prisons with Provincial/State Governments, forming the legal basis for State-level prison administration in India.

Your note

IAS Indian Polity in other years

Indian Polity 2026 Indian Polity 2025 Indian Polity 2024 Indian Polity 2022 Indian Polity 2021 Indian Polity 2020 Indian Polity 2019 Indian Polity 2018 Indian Polity 2017 Indian Polity 2016 Indian Polity 2015 Indian Polity 2014

More IAS Indian Polity questions

Consider the following statements with reference to the Constitution of India: 1. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that specifies that the Constitution of India will be officially called the 'Constitution of India'. 2. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that specifies that the Indian Independence Act, 1947 and the Government of India Act, 1935 stand repealed. 3. There is no Article in the Constitution of India that mentions 26th January, 1950 as the date of the commencement of the Constitution of India. Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?

2026hard

'X' was addressing a seminar on the meaning of the term 'law' as provided under Article 13, Part III of the Constitution of India. 'X' explained that the meaning of the term 'law' in the Constitution of India was very comprehensive. It included ordinances, orders and even rules and regulations. 'Y' pointed out that the term 'law' in Article 13 also included custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law, to which 'X' was not convinced. Based on the above, select the correct conclusion from the options given below:

2026medium

In a multi-ethnic district where both economic competition and historical grievances frequently led to community tensions, a flashpoint has arisen with a Government decision to allocate land for a waste management facility near a tribal hamlet, sparking protests by the tribal community, which claimed that the land was sacred and critical to their cultural identity. At the same time, urban residents and local industries supported the project, citing severe solid waste challenges and health concerns due to lack of a proper disposal site. The conflict has escalated with road blockades, social media campaigns, and allegations of police excesses. As a responsible Government official, you are tasked with resolving the situation through mediation, ensuring a sustainable outcome that balances environmental needs, tribal rights, and urban public health. Consider the following statements with reference to the above: 1. A successful conflict resolution process must begin with acknowledging the cultural concerns of the protesting tribal community before discussing technical alternatives. 2. The Government should move ahead with the project without delay to address urban health concerns, which outweigh the sentiments of a small group. 3. Creating a multi-stakeholder dialogue platform — including tribal leaders, environmental experts, and municipal representatives — to build mutual understanding and help de-escalate tensions. 4. Conducting an independent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and sharing findings transparently with both sides to facilitate evidence-based decision-making. Which of the statements given above would contribute to the resolution process?

2026medium

Ms. X is a mid-level civil service official working in the urban development department of a major city. Recently, she was involved in approving a contract for a public infrastructure project — a new community park. During the approval process, she received a piece of confidential information indicating that one of the shortlisted contractors had a history of poor workmanship and allegations of corruption in other cities, though nothing had been legally proven. The Head of the Department, Mr. Y, advised her not to disclose this information to the project committee or the public because it could delay the project and damage the city's reputation. However, Ms. X believed that withholding such information compromised transparency and public trust. What amongst the following should Ms. X do now? 1. Immediately disclose the information to the project committee and the public 2. Recommend removing the contractor from the shortlist to protect the project's integrity 3. Propose a 'limited disclosure' to an oversight committee, while keeping the information confidential from the public for the time being Select the answer using the code given below :

2026medium

Consider the following statements about the Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes of the Parliament of India: 1. Although members of this Committee are elected from both Houses of Parliament, the Chairperson of this Committee is appointed by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. 2. Twenty members are elected by the Rajya Sabha and ten members by the Lok Sabha. 3. No Minister, except for the Union Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment, is eligible to be a member of this Committee. 4. Members are elected for a fixed term of two years from the date they enter their office. Which one of the following conclusions based on the above statements is correct?

2026medium

View all Indian Polity questions

Keep practicing Indian Polity

Work through every IAS Indian Polity PYQ, year by year.

Browse all Political Science topics

The correct option is Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.

Explanation

Statement-I — Correct
In India, prisons are managed by the respective State Governments. Each State has the authority to frame its own rules and regulations for the day-to-day internal administration of prisons — covering matters such as prisoner classification, discipline, diet, labour, and medical care. This administrative autonomy is a direct consequence of prisons being a State subject under the constitutional scheme.
Statement-II — Correct
The Prisons Act, 1894 is the principal central legislation governing prisons in India. This Act, enacted during British rule, expressly vested control over prisons with the Provincial (now State) Governments. It provides the broad framework — including rules relating to custody, treatment, and discipline of prisoners — while leaving operational administration to the States. The Act has not been comprehensively replaced and continues to serve as the foundational statute, supplemented by State-specific Prison Manuals.