Correct Option (d)
Explanation
Statement 1 is incorrect. Article 88 of the Constitution of India grants the Attorney General of India the right to speak in, and otherwise to take part in the proceedings of, either House of Parliament, any joint sitting of the Houses, and any committee of Parliament of which he may be named a member, but without a right to vote. However, this constitutional provision does not extend to the Solicitor General of India. The Solicitor General is not a constitutional post and is not explicitly granted the right to participate in parliamentary proceedings by the Constitution.
Statement 2 is incorrect. Article 76(3) states that the Attorney General shall hold office during the pleasure of the President. The Constitution does not mandate that the Attorney General must submit his resignation when the government that appointed him resigns. While it is a convention for the Attorney General to resign when there is a change in government, it is not a constitutional requirement.
Incorrect Options
Option (a) is incorrect because Statement 1 is factually inaccurate regarding the Solicitor General's constitutional right to participate in Parliament.
Option (b) is incorrect because Statement 2 is factually inaccurate regarding the Attorney General's resignation being constitutionally tied to the government's resignation.
Option (c) is incorrect as both Statement 1 and Statement 2 are incorrect.