Correct Option
Both Gandhism and Marxism ultimately envision a society devoid of a formal state apparatus. Karl Marx theorized that following a period of proletarian dictatorship, the state would "wither away," leading to a stateless and classless society. Mahatma Gandhi's concept of Ram Rajya similarly aimed for a decentralized, self-governing system where individuals exercised self-rule, thereby minimizing the necessity of state intervention. Thus, despite their divergent methodologies, both ideologies share the ultimate objective of a stateless society.
Incorrect Options
Option (b) Class struggle: This is not a common agreement. Marxism is fundamentally based on the concept of class struggle as the driving force of historical change, advocating for the proletariat to overthrow the bourgeoisie. In contrast, Gandhian philosophy advocates for class harmony and cooperation, promoting non-violent resolution of conflicts and trusteeship rather than struggle between social classes.
Option (c) Abolition of private property: This is also not a shared principle. Marxism explicitly calls for the abolition of private property, advocating for collective ownership of the means of production. Gandhism, however, supports the principle of 'trusteeship,' where wealthy individuals are expected to manage their property and wealth as trustees for the welfare of society, rather than advocating for its outright state ownership or abolition.
Option (d) Economic determinism: This is another point of divergence. Marxism posits economic determinism, asserting that economic conditions and relations are the primary determinants of all other aspects of society, including politics, culture, and ideology. Gandhi, on the other hand, placed greater emphasis on moral and spiritual values, considering them superior to purely economic factors in shaping human society and individual conduct.