Correct Option (C)
A mechanism of parliamentary democracy for ensuring collective responsibility of the Government to the people.
The Cabinet form of Government operates on the principle of collective responsibility. This means that the Council of Ministers, as a collective body, is accountable to the Lok Sabha (the directly elected house of the Parliament). Article 75(3) of the Indian Constitution explicitly states this principle. If a vote of no-confidence is passed against the Council of Ministers, the entire ministry, including the Prime Minister, must resign. This mechanism ensures governmental accountability to the elected representatives of the people, thereby upholding democratic principles.
Incorrect Options:
A) An arrangement for minimizing the criticism against the Government whose responsibilities are complex and hard to carry out to the satisfaction of all.
While a government's responsibilities are indeed complex, the primary principle of the Cabinet form of government is not to minimize criticism. Instead, it is designed to ensure accountability and responsiveness, which may involve facing and addressing criticism. The system provides mechanisms for scrutiny rather than evasion of criticism.
B) A mechanism for speeding up the activities of the Government whose responsibilities are increasing day by day.
The Cabinet form of government does not inherently guarantee faster governmental activity. Its core function is not administrative efficiency in terms of speed, but rather democratic accountability and collective decision-making. While a well-functioning cabinet can be efficient, speed is not its defining principle.
D) A device for strengthening the hands of the head of the Government whose hold over the people is in a state of decline.
The Cabinet form of government emphasizes the collective responsibility of the Council of Ministers, not solely the strengthening of the head of government (Prime Minister). While the Prime Minister holds a significant position, the system is designed to ensure collective decision-making and accountability to the legislature, rather than to bolster a declining individual hold over the populace. It is a system of governance, not a tool for individual political consolidation.