Correct Option
All three statements are correct. The Supreme Court, in the landmark case of Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986), held that no person can be compelled to sing the National Anthem. This ruling affirmed that compelling an individual to sing the National Anthem would infringe upon fundamental rights and legal principles.
Statement 1 is correct: Forcing an individual to vocalize words against their will can be considered a violation of the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression, guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. This right includes the freedom to remain silent.
Statement 2 is correct: Compelling someone to sing the National Anthem when it conflicts with their genuine religious beliefs infringes upon the Right to Freedom of Conscience and the right to freely profess, practice, and propagate religion, as enshrined in Article 25(1). The Bijoe Emmanuel case specifically dealt with Jehovah's Witnesses whose religious tenets prohibited singing the anthem.
Statement 3 is correct: There is no statutory provision or legal mandate that obliges a person to sing the National Anthem. While showing respect by standing when the anthem is played is expected, singing it is not legally enforceable. The Supreme Court's judgment clarified this distinction.
Incorrect Options
Options (a), (b), and (d) are incorrect because all three statements (1, 2, and 3) are factually and legally correct, as established by constitutional provisions and Supreme Court pronouncements, particularly in the Bijoe Emmanuel v. State of Kerala (1986) case.