The correct option is (a) - Select this option if the question can be answered using one of these statements alone, but cannot be answered using other statement.
[as per provisional answerkey]Analysis
Statement I alone: xy2=116
We are given that x, y, and z are integers greater than 1. Let's find the prime factorization of 116:
116=2×58=2×2×29=29×22.
Since the equation is x×y2=116 and y must be an integer greater than 1, the only possible value for y2 is 22 (which is 4).
If y2=4, then y=2 (which is > 1).
Substituting this back: x×4=116, which gives x=29.
Since 29 is a prime number, we get a definitive "Yes" to the question "Is x a prime number?".
Statement I alone is sufficient.
Statement II alone: xz=261
We are given xz=261, where x and z are integers greater than 1. Let's find the factors of 261:
261=3×87=3×3×29=9×29.
Possible pairs for (x, z) such that both are greater than 1 are:
1. x=3, z=87 (x is prime)
2. x=9, z=29 (x is NOT prime)
3. x=29, z=9 (x is prime)
4. x=87, z=3 (x is NOT prime)
Because x can be either prime (3, 29) or composite (9, 87), we cannot determine if x is definitely a prime number.
Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Why the other options are incorrect
- Option (b) - either statement alone: This is incorrect because Statement II fails to provide a unique answer (x could be 9 or 29), whereas Statement I provides a unique prime value for x.
- Option (c) - both statements together: This is incorrect because Statement I is already sufficient on its own. The "together" option is only chosen when neither statement works independently.
- Option (d) - cannot be answered: This is incorrect because Statement I provides a definitive mathematical proof that x must be 29, which is a prime number.
Key Concept
Prime factorization and integer constraints (x, y > 1) in algebraic equations to determine unique values.