IAS 2025 — CSAT Reasoning

2025mcqmedium

A mobile phone has been stolen. There are 3 suspects P, Q and R. They were questioned knowing that only one of them is guilty. Their responses are as follows:
P: I did not steal. Q stole it.
Q: R did not steal. I did not steal.
R: I did not steal. I do not know who did it.
Who stole the mobile phone?

Official previous-year question

Verified 2 Aug 2026.

Options

AP
BR
CQ
DCannot be concluded

Did you get this right?

Solution

Correct Option (A)

The problem states that only one suspect is guilty. The guilty individual lies, while innocent individuals tell the truth.

Let us assume P is the guilty party:

If P is guilty, P's statements must be false.
- P's statement "I did not steal" becomes false, implying P stole the mobile phone.
- P's statement "Q stole it" becomes false, implying Q did not steal the mobile phone.
Now, we examine the statements of Q and R, who must be innocent and therefore truthful:
- Q's statements:
  - "R did not steal" must be true. This is consistent with R being innocent.
  - "I did not steal" must be true. This is consistent with Q being innocent.
- R's statements:
  - "I did not steal" must be true. This is consistent with R being innocent.
  - "I do not know who did it" must be true. This is consistent with R being innocent and unaware of P's guilt.
All statements are consistent under the assumption that P is guilty. Therefore, P stole the mobile phone.

Incorrect Options:

Let us analyze the scenarios where Q or R are assumed guilty:

If Q is guilty:
- Q's statements must be false.
  - Q's statement "I did not steal" becomes false, implying Q stole the mobile phone.
  - Q's statement "R did not steal" becomes false, implying R stole the mobile phone.
- This scenario leads to a contradiction, as both Q and R would be guilty, which violates the problem's condition that only one person is guilty. Therefore, Q cannot be guilty.
If R is guilty:
- R's statements must be false.
  - R's statement "I did not steal" becomes false, implying R stole the mobile phone.
- Now, we examine Q's statements, as Q must be innocent and truthful.
  - Q's statement "R did not steal" must be true.
- This contradicts our initial assumption that R stole the mobile phone. Therefore, R cannot be guilty.
Cannot be concluded:
- As demonstrated, a consistent scenario is established when P is identified as the guilty party, with all statements aligning with the given conditions. Thus, a definitive conclusion can be reached.

Your note

IAS Reasoning in other years

Reasoning 2026 Reasoning 2024 Reasoning 2023 Reasoning 2022 Reasoning 2021 Reasoning 2020 Reasoning 2019 Reasoning 2018 Reasoning 2017 Reasoning 2016 Reasoning 2015 Reasoning 2014

More IAS Reasoning questions

P, Q, R, S and T are ranked 1 to 5 (not necessarily in that order). The rank of P is 4, the rank of Q is not 5, the rank of R is 1, the rank of S is not 2, the rank of T is not 3. Then which of the following is/are correct? 1. If the rank of S is 3, then that of T is 2. 2. If the rank of Q is 3, then that of T is 5. Select the answer using the code given below.

2026easy

There are four statements X, Y, Z and W. Their relations are as follows: If X is incorrect, then so is Z; if Y is incorrect, then W is correct; if W is correct, then X is incorrect. Which of the following is/are correct? 1. If X is correct, then so is Y. 2. If Z is correct, then it is not necessary that Y is correct. Select the answer using the code given below.

2026medium

A cut on a solid object divides the object into two parts where the new surfaces thus produced are plane. On the other hand, one single cut can be used to cut more than one object at a time. In an experiment, the total number of pieces produced by applying n cuts is denoted by \(x_n\). The experiment is performed on a solid cube where pieces remain unmoved after each cut. In this experiment, if after the third cut, the pieces are identical, then which of the following is not a possible value for \(x_4\)?

2026hard

Two identical straight rods are painted in five distinct colours so that each of them gets divided into five equal parts along the length. In one of them, the portions are marked P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 (not necessarily in that order) whereas in the other, they are marked Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 and Q5 (not necessarily in that order). When the rods are kept parallel to each other side by side, P1 and Q3 match, P4 matches Q1 or Q2, and Q4 matches P3 or P5. If Q3 and Q5 are adjacent, which of the following is/are possible? 1. Q3 is marked at the middle portion of the straight rod. 2. P2 is marked at one of the extreme portions of the straight rod. Select the answer using the code given below.

2026medium

Seven cubes are identical in shape. Out of these, the weight of each of the six cubes is equal and the weight of the remaining cube is less than the weight of any other cube. A balance is used to identify the lightest cube. What is the minimum number of attempts required to distinguish the odd cube with certainty?

2026medium

View all Reasoning questions

Keep practicing Reasoning

Work through every IAS Reasoning PYQ, year by year.

Browse all CSAT topics

Correct Option (A)

The problem states that only one suspect is guilty. The guilty individual lies, while innocent individuals tell the truth.

Let us assume P is the guilty party:

If P is guilty, P's statements must be false.
- P's statement "I did not steal" becomes false, implying P stole the mobile phone.
- P's statement "Q stole it" becomes false, implying Q did not steal the mobile phone.
Now, we examine the statements of Q and R, who must be innocent and therefore truthful:
- Q's statements:
  - "R did not steal" must be true. This is consistent with R being innocent.
  - "I did not steal" must be true. This is consistent with Q being innocent.
- R's statements:
  - "I did not steal" must be true. This is consistent with R being innocent.
  - "I do not know who did it" must be true. This is consistent with R being innocent and unaware of P's guilt.
All statements are consistent under the assumption that P is guilty. Therefore, P stole the mobile phone.

Incorrect Options:

Let us analyze the scenarios where Q or R are assumed guilty:

If Q is guilty:
- Q's statements must be false.
  - Q's statement "I did not steal" becomes false, implying Q stole the mobile phone.
  - Q's statement "R did not steal" becomes false, implying R stole the mobile phone.
- This scenario leads to a contradiction, as both Q and R would be guilty, which violates the problem's condition that only one person is guilty. Therefore, Q cannot be guilty.
If R is guilty:
- R's statements must be false.
  - R's statement "I did not steal" becomes false, implying R stole the mobile phone.
- Now, we examine Q's statements, as Q must be innocent and truthful.
  - Q's statement "R did not steal" must be true.
- This contradicts our initial assumption that R stole the mobile phone. Therefore, R cannot be guilty.
Cannot be concluded:
- As demonstrated, a consistent scenario is established when P is identified as the guilty party, with all statements aligning with the given conditions. Thus, a definitive conclusion can be reached.

IAS 2025 — CSAT Reasoning

Options

Did you get this right?

Solution

Correct Option (A)

Incorrect Options:

Your note

IAS Reasoning in other years

More IAS Reasoning questions

Other CSAT topics for IAS

Comprehension

Maths

Keep practicing Reasoning

IAS 2025 — CSAT Reasoning

Options

Did you get this right?

Solution

Correct Option (A)

Incorrect Options:

Your note

IAS Reasoning in other years

More IAS Reasoning questions

Other CSAT topics for IAS

Comprehension

Maths

Keep practicing Reasoning