Consider the questions and two statements given below: Question: Is Z brother of X? 1. Statement 1: X is a brother of Y and Y is a brother of Z. 2. Statement 2: X, Y and Z are siblings. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the question and statements?

Correct Option (4) : Both Statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question. To answer the question "Is Z brother of X?", the gender of Z must be definitively established as male, in addition to Z being a sibling of X. - Analysis of Statement 1: "X is a brother of Y and Y is a brother of Z." - This implies X is male, and Y is male. - It also establishes that X, Y, and Z are siblings. - However, Statement 1 provides no information regarding the gender of Z. Z could be either a brother or a sister to X. - Therefore, Statement 1 alone is insufficient. - Analysis of Statement 2: "X, Y and Z are siblings." - This statement confirms a sibling relationship among X, Y, and Z. - However, it provides no information about the gender of any of the individuals (X, Y, or Z). - Therefore, Statement 2 alone is insufficient. - Analysis of Statement 1 and Statement 2 combined: - Even when both statements are considered together, the gender of Z remains undetermined. While it is known that X, Y, and Z are siblings, and X and Y are male, Z's gender is not specified by either statement or their combination. - Consequently, it cannot be definitively concluded whether Z is a brother or a sister of X. - Thus, both statements together are insufficient to answer the question. Incorrect Options: Option 1: Statement 1 alone is sufficient to answer the question. Statement 1 establishes X and Y as male siblings, and that Z is their sibling. However, it does not specify Z's gender, making it impossible to confirm if Z is a brother. Hence, it is insufficient. Option 2: Statement 2 alone is sufficient to answer the question. Statement 2 only indicates that X, Y, and Z are siblings. It provides no information about the gender of any of them. Therefore, it is insufficient to determine if Z is a brother of X. Option 3: Both Statement 1 and 2 are sufficient to answer the question. As detailed in the analysis of the correct option, even combining both statements does not provide information about Z's gender. Without knowing Z's gender, it cannot be determined if Z is a brother of X. Hence, both statements together are insufficient. [Image: image]

IAS 2022 — CSAT Reasoning

2022mcqmedium

Consider the questions and two statements given below:

Question: Is Z brother of X?

Statement 1: X is a brother of Y and Y is a brother of Z.
Statement 2: X, Y and Z are siblings.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the question and statements?

Official previous-year question

Verified 2 Aug 2026.

Options

AStatement 1 alone is sufficient to answer the question.
BStatement 2 alone is sufficient to answer the question.
CBoth Statement 1 and 2 are sufficient to answer the question.
DBoth Statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question.

Did you get this right?

Solution

Correct Option (4)

: Both Statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question.

To answer the question "Is Z brother of X?", the gender of Z must be definitively established as male, in addition to Z being a sibling of X.

Analysis of Statement 1: "X is a brother of Y and Y is a brother of Z."
- This implies X is male, and Y is male.
- It also establishes that X, Y, and Z are siblings.
- However, Statement 1 provides no information regarding the gender of Z. Z could be either a brother or a sister to X.
- Therefore, Statement 1 alone is insufficient.
Analysis of Statement 2: "X, Y and Z are siblings."
- This statement confirms a sibling relationship among X, Y, and Z.
- However, it provides no information about the gender of any of the individuals (X, Y, or Z).
- Therefore, Statement 2 alone is insufficient.
Analysis of Statement 1 and Statement 2 combined:
- Even when both statements are considered together, the gender of Z remains undetermined. While it is known that X, Y, and Z are siblings, and X and Y are male, Z's gender is not specified by either statement or their combination.
- Consequently, it cannot be definitively concluded whether Z is a brother or a sister of X.
- Thus, both statements together are insufficient to answer the question.

Incorrect Options:

Option 1: Statement 1 alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Statement 1 establishes X and Y as male siblings, and that Z is their sibling. However, it does not specify Z's gender, making it impossible to confirm if Z is a brother. Hence, it is insufficient.

Option 2: Statement 2 alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Statement 2 only indicates that X, Y, and Z are siblings. It provides no information about the gender of any of them. Therefore, it is insufficient to determine if Z is a brother of X.

Option 3: Both Statement 1 and 2 are sufficient to answer the question.

As detailed in the analysis of the correct option, even combining both statements does not provide information about Z's gender. Without knowing Z's gender, it cannot be determined if Z is a brother of X. Hence, both statements together are insufficient.

Your note

IAS Reasoning in other years

Reasoning 2026 Reasoning 2025 Reasoning 2024 Reasoning 2023 Reasoning 2021 Reasoning 2020 Reasoning 2019 Reasoning 2018 Reasoning 2017 Reasoning 2016 Reasoning 2015 Reasoning 2014

More IAS Reasoning questions

P, Q, R, S and T are ranked 1 to 5 (not necessarily in that order). The rank of P is 4, the rank of Q is not 5, the rank of R is 1, the rank of S is not 2, the rank of T is not 3. Then which of the following is/are correct? 1. If the rank of S is 3, then that of T is 2. 2. If the rank of Q is 3, then that of T is 5. Select the answer using the code given below.

2026easy

There are four statements X, Y, Z and W. Their relations are as follows: If X is incorrect, then so is Z; if Y is incorrect, then W is correct; if W is correct, then X is incorrect. Which of the following is/are correct? 1. If X is correct, then so is Y. 2. If Z is correct, then it is not necessary that Y is correct. Select the answer using the code given below.

2026medium

A cut on a solid object divides the object into two parts where the new surfaces thus produced are plane. On the other hand, one single cut can be used to cut more than one object at a time. In an experiment, the total number of pieces produced by applying n cuts is denoted by \(x_n\). The experiment is performed on a solid cube where pieces remain unmoved after each cut. In this experiment, if after the third cut, the pieces are identical, then which of the following is not a possible value for \(x_4\)?

2026hard

Two identical straight rods are painted in five distinct colours so that each of them gets divided into five equal parts along the length. In one of them, the portions are marked P1, P2, P3, P4 and P5 (not necessarily in that order) whereas in the other, they are marked Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 and Q5 (not necessarily in that order). When the rods are kept parallel to each other side by side, P1 and Q3 match, P4 matches Q1 or Q2, and Q4 matches P3 or P5. If Q3 and Q5 are adjacent, which of the following is/are possible? 1. Q3 is marked at the middle portion of the straight rod. 2. P2 is marked at one of the extreme portions of the straight rod. Select the answer using the code given below.

2026medium

Seven cubes are identical in shape. Out of these, the weight of each of the six cubes is equal and the weight of the remaining cube is less than the weight of any other cube. A balance is used to identify the lightest cube. What is the minimum number of attempts required to distinguish the odd cube with certainty?

2026medium

View all Reasoning questions

Keep practicing Reasoning

Work through every IAS Reasoning PYQ, year by year.

Browse all CSAT topics

Correct Option (4)

: Both Statement 1 and 2 are not sufficient to answer the question.

To answer the question "Is Z brother of X?", the gender of Z must be definitively established as male, in addition to Z being a sibling of X.

Analysis of Statement 1: "X is a brother of Y and Y is a brother of Z."
- This implies X is male, and Y is male.
- It also establishes that X, Y, and Z are siblings.
- However, Statement 1 provides no information regarding the gender of Z. Z could be either a brother or a sister to X.
- Therefore, Statement 1 alone is insufficient.
Analysis of Statement 2: "X, Y and Z are siblings."
- This statement confirms a sibling relationship among X, Y, and Z.
- However, it provides no information about the gender of any of the individuals (X, Y, or Z).
- Therefore, Statement 2 alone is insufficient.
Analysis of Statement 1 and Statement 2 combined:
- Even when both statements are considered together, the gender of Z remains undetermined. While it is known that X, Y, and Z are siblings, and X and Y are male, Z's gender is not specified by either statement or their combination.
- Consequently, it cannot be definitively concluded whether Z is a brother or a sister of X.
- Thus, both statements together are insufficient to answer the question.

Incorrect Options:

Option 1: Statement 1 alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Option 2: Statement 2 alone is sufficient to answer the question.

Statement 2 only indicates that X, Y, and Z are siblings. It provides no information about the gender of any of them. Therefore, it is insufficient to determine if Z is a brother of X.

Option 3: Both Statement 1 and 2 are sufficient to answer the question.

IAS 2022 — CSAT Reasoning

Options

Did you get this right?

Solution

Correct Option (4)

Incorrect Options:

Your note

IAS Reasoning in other years

More IAS Reasoning questions

Other CSAT topics for IAS

Comprehension

Maths

Keep practicing Reasoning

IAS 2022 — CSAT Reasoning

Options

Did you get this right?

Solution

Correct Option (4)

Incorrect Options:

Your note

IAS Reasoning in other years

More IAS Reasoning questions

Other CSAT topics for IAS

Comprehension

Maths

Keep practicing Reasoning