Correct Option (D)
Let S, M, and R represent the weights of Sohan, Mohan, and Rohan, respectively.
- Statement S1: "Twice the weight of Sohan is less than the weight of Mohan or that of Rohan."
- This implies the inequalities: 2S < M and 2S < R.
- From these, it is clear that S < M and S < R. Therefore, Sohan's weight is not the greatest among the three.
- Statement S2: "Twice the weight of Rohan is greater than the weight of Mohan or that of Sohan."
- This implies the inequalities: 2R > M and 2R > S.
- The condition 2R > S further confirms that Sohan is not the heaviest.
- The condition 2R > M establishes a relationship between Rohan and Mohan. However, this inequality alone does not definitively determine whether R > M or M > R. For example:
- If M = 100 units and R = 60 units, then 2R = 120, which is greater than M. In this case, M is greater than R.
- If M = 60 units and R = 100 units, then 2R = 200, which is greater than M. In this case, R is greater than M.
Since the precise weight relationship between Mohan and Rohan cannot be conclusively established from the given statements, it is not possible to determine whose weight is the greatest.
Incorrect Options:
Option A (Weight of Mohan is greatest): This cannot be definitively concluded. While Mohan is heavier than Sohan (S < M from S1), the relationship between Mohan and Rohan (2R > M from S2) does not guarantee that Mohan's weight is the greatest. As demonstrated, Rohan could be heavier than Mohan, or Mohan could be heavier than Rohan, while satisfying the condition 2R > M.
Option B (Weight of Sohan is greatest): This is incorrect. Statement S1 (2S < M and 2S < R) clearly indicates that Sohan's weight is less than both Mohan's and Rohan's weights, making Sohan the lightest, not the greatest.
Option C (Weight of Rohan is greatest): This cannot be definitively concluded. While Rohan is heavier than Sohan (S < R from S1 and 2R > S from S2), the condition 2R > M from S2 does not guarantee that Rohan is heavier than Mohan. Scenarios exist where Mohan's weight is greater than Rohan's, yet 2R > M holds true.