Correct Option (D)
The statement "Morning walk is good for health" indicates a positive correlation or benefit. It suggests that engaging in morning walks contributes positively to one's health. However, this statement does not establish exclusivity or necessity.
Conclusion 1 states, "All healthy people go for morning walk." This is an overgeneralization. The statement only highlights a benefit, not a universal practice among all healthy individuals. It is possible for people to be healthy through other means or activities without necessarily engaging in morning walks.
Conclusion 2 states, "Morning walk is essential for maintaining good health." The term "essential" implies an indispensable requirement. The original statement uses the word "good," which denotes a positive attribute but does not elevate it to the level of an absolute necessity. Good health can be maintained through various practices, and the statement does not suggest that morning walks are the sole or mandatory component.
Therefore, neither conclusion can be logically derived from the given statement.
Incorrect Options:
Options A, B, and C are incorrect because they assert the validity of at least one of the conclusions, which is not supported by the statement.
Option A (1 only) is incorrect because Conclusion 1 makes an unwarranted universal claim ("All healthy people go for morning walk") that cannot be inferred from the statement that morning walks are merely "good for health."
Option B (2 only) is incorrect because Conclusion 2 introduces the strong term "essential," which is not supported by the statement's milder assertion that morning walks are "good" for health. The statement does not imply indispensability.
Option C (Both 1 and 2) is incorrect as both individual conclusions are invalid for the reasons stated above.